Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
History
Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
Electricity -- History; Electricity -- History -- Bibliography; Magnetism -- History; Magnetism -- History -- Bibliography; Science, Medieval
REFERENCES.--Camillus Leonardus, “Speculum Lapidum”; the notes
at p. 180, Vol. I. of Dr. Geo. Miller’s “Hist. Phil. Ill.,”
London, 1849, Vol. I. p. 179, note; Venanson, “Boussole,”
pp. 158, 160; Knight, “Mech. Dict.,” Vol. II. p. 1398;
Collenutius--Collenuccio--“Compendio ... regno di Napoli,”
Venice, 1591; “Discussione della leggenda di Flavio Gioia,
inventore della bussola” (T. Bertelli, in “Rivista di Fisica
Mat. e Sc. Nat.,” Pavia, 1901, II. pp. 529–541); Matteo Camara,
“Memorie ... di Amalfi,” Salerno, 1876; “Literary Digest,” July
6, 1901, translated from “Le Cosmos,” Paris, June 8, 1901;
Giraldi, “Libellus de Re Nautica,” Bâle, 1540; Admiral Luigi
Fincati, “Il Magnete, la calamita e la bussola,” Rome, 1878;
“Annales de Géographie,” Vol. XI. No. 59, pp. 7–8 for September
15, 1902, and G. Grimaldi in the “Mem. d. Accad. Etrus. di
Cortona”; Paulus Jovius, “Historiarum,” Florence, 1552; Pietro
Napoli Signorelli, “Sull’invenzione della bussola nautica ...”;
M. A. Blondus, “De Ventis,” Venice, 1546; Cælius Calcagninus,
“Thesaurus Græcarum Antiquitatum,” 1697, Vol. XI. p. 761;
Houzeau et Lancaster, “Bibl. Gén.,” Vol. II. p. 149; “Riv. G.
Ital.,” X. 1903, pp. 1, 11, 105–122, 314–334.
For Briet (Philippe), _b._ 1601, _d._ 1668, see Michaud, “Biog. Univ.,”
Paris, 1843, Vol. V. p. 527. The best, most complete edition of Briet’s
“Annales Mundi” is the Venice, 1693.
=A.D. 1327–1377.=--It has been claimed by F. M. Arouet de Voltaire,
who asserts it at Vol. III. pp. 251–252 of his “Essai sur les Mœurs et
l’Esprit des Nations,” Paris, 1809, “that the first well-authenticated
use of the compass” was made by the English during this period, which
is that of the reign of King Edward III.
By Voltaire, the extraordinary (_prodigieuse_) antiquity of the
Chinese is not questioned. They knew of the compass, but he says “it
was not employed by them for its proper use, that of guiding vessels
at sea. They travelled only along the shores. Possessed, as they were,
of a country that furnished everything, they did not feel the need
of going, as we do, to the other end of the world” (Vol. I. pp. 239,
247). Speaking of the Portuguese (Vol. III. p. 257) he says: “It was
not before known if the magnetic needle would point to the south on
approaching the South Pole; it was found to point constantly to the
north during the year 1486.”
From the time of Edward III, the compass was known in England by the
names of _adamant_, _sailing needle_ and _sail-stone dial_, as has been
shown in the writings of Chaucer and others, the most important of
which will be duly quoted in their order. The compass was alluded to,
more particularly, by John Gower, “Confessio Amantis,”[20] Books I and
VI; by Richard Hakluyt, “Voyages,” Vol. I. pp. 213, 215; and by Edward
Fairfax, “Godefroy de Boulogne,” Book XV. s. 18.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account