Bilingualism: Address delivered before the Quebec Canadian Club: At Quebec, Tuesday, March 28th, 1916Belcourt, N. A. (Napoléon-Antoine)
History
Bilingualism: Address delivered before the Quebec Canadian Club: At Quebec, Tuesday, March 28th, 1916
Belcourt, N. A. (Napoléon-Antoine)
Bilingualism; Education, Bilingual -- Ontario; Language policy -- Ontario; Speeches, addresses, etc.
Gentlemen, I want to quote also a letter of Dr. Ryerson, whose name I
have just mentioned, dating as far back as 1857, and this letter,
although it contains but four lines, contains the whole thesis upon
which this question rests. I invite your special attention to every word
of this letter, not only because of the man who wrote it, but on account
of the significance of the words he uses. It is as follows:
"24th April, 1857.
"Gentlemen:--
"I have the honour to state in reply to your letter of the
16th instant THAT, AS THE FRENCH IS THE RECOGNIZED LANGUAGE
OF THE COUNTRY, as well as the English, IT IS QUITE PROPER
AND LAWFUL for the trustees to ALLOW BOTH LANGUAGES TO BE
TAUGHT in their schools to children whose parents may desire
them to learn both.
"I have the honour to be, Gentlemen,
"Your obedient servant,
"(Sgd.) E. Ryerson."
I also stated that I would quote Sir James Whitney, and that is very
much more recent history. Within a few months of the promulgation of
regulation No. 17, in fact on the 25th of July, 1911, Sir James Whitney
caused this letter to be written:
"25th July, 1911.
"Reverend and Dear Sir:--
"I am directed by the Prime Minister, Sir James Whitney, to
acknowledge your letter of the 21st and to state that no
change has been made in the school law or the department
regulations AFFECTING THE STUDY OF THE FRENCH LANGUAGE IN
THE SCHOOLS.
"I AM DIRECTED TO POINT OUT THAT THE QUESTION IS ONE
ENTIRELY UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES....
"(Signed) A. H. U. Colquhoun.
"Deputy Minister of Education."
This letter was written to Reverend Father Chaine, of Arnprior, a town
not far from Ottawa.
I spoke to you a moment ago of the right to appoint trustees. I want
you, gentlemen, many of whom I have the honour of calling my friends,
and whom I see before me, my Protestant friends of Quebec, how would
you like it if the Roman Catholic School Committee in this province were
to arrogate to itself the right to appoint the teachers in your
dissentient schools, and to define their duties? How would you like it?
Would you think that was keeping faith with the British North America
Act? Would you think that was keeping faith with the Confederation
partnership? How would you like it if this same Committee, not only
would assume to appoint your teachers and your inspectors, and would
take good care also to appoint Catholic inspectors in your Protestant
schools--how would you like it? Will you not take that suggestion home
with you, gentlemen, and think it over? How would you like this
regulation No. 17 to be applied to the Province of Quebec?
Let me read the two or three most important sections of the regulation
and substitute the word "French" for the word "English" and vice versa
wherever they occur, and I want you to take that home also and think it
over. Let us read section 3 of the regulation No. 17:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account