Biology versus Theology. The Bible: irreconcilable with Science, Experience, and even its own statementsJulian
Religion
Biology versus Theology. The Bible: irreconcilable with Science, Experience, and even its own statements
Julian
Bible and science
Transcribed from the 1871 George P. Bacon edition by David Price.
[No 11.
BIOLOGY VERSUS THEOLOGY.
THE BIBLE
IRRECONCILABLE WITH SCIENCE, EXPERIENCE,
AND EVEN ITS OWN STATEMENTS.
BY JULIAN.
* * * * *
“Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas
Quique metus omnes et inexorabile fatum—
Subjecit pedibus, strepitumque Acherontis avari.”
VIRGIL.
“Know, then, thyself—Presume not God to scan;
The proper study of Mankind is Man.”
POPE’S ESSAY ON MAN.
“If it be possible to perfect mankind, the means of doing so will be
found in the Medical Sciences.”
DESCARTES.
* * * * *
* * * * *
Lewes:
GEORGE P. BACON, STEAM PRINTING OFFICES.
1871.
CONTENTS.
PAGE.
INTRODUCTION 3
PART I.—SCRIPTURE IRRECONCILABLE WITH SCIENCE.
(1) The Mosaic Cosmogony 5
(2) The Fall 11
(3) The Flood 13
PART II.—SCRIPTURE IRRECONCILABLE WITH HUMAN EXPERIENCE.
(Miracles) 16
(1) Pre-historic Man 21
(2) Increase of Man 24
(3) Armies of the Jews, and numbers slain in 26
battle
(4) Incredible Statements 28
PART III.—THE BIBLE IRRECONCILABLE WITH ITSELF.
(a) Historic Errors 31
(b) Erroneous Figures 33
(c) Misstatements 39
PART III.—SECOND DIVISION.—SCRIPTURE CONTRADICTS SCRIPTURE.
Contradictory Texts 46
CONCLUSION 61
INTRODUCTION.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account