Birds and Nature, Vol 10 No. 2 [September 1901] — John Shaqi
Birds and Nature, Vol 10 No. 2 [September 1901]Various
History
Birds and Nature, Vol 10 No. 2 [September 1901]
Various
Birds -- Periodicals; Natural history -- Periodicals
“The earliest notice of the common Ruby-throat that I have been able to
find,” Mr. Ridgway continues, “is an extract from a letter written from
Boston in New England, October 26, 1670, by John Winthrop, Esq.,
governor of Connecticut, to Francis Willoughby, Esq., and published in
the philosophical Transactions.” This letter reads as follows:
“I send you withal, a little Box, with a Curiosity in it, which perhaps
will be counted a trifle, yet ’tis rarely to be met with, even here. It
is the curiously contrived nest of the Humming-Bird, so called from the
humming noise it maketh as it flies. ’Tis an exceeding little Bird, and
only seen in Summer, and mostly in gardens, flying from flower, sucking
Honey out of the flowers as the Bee doth; as it flieth not lighting on
the flower, but hovering over it, sucking with its long Bill a sweet
substance. There are in the same Nest two of that Bird’s eggs. Whether
they used to have more at once I know not. I never saw but one of these
Nests before, and that was sent over formerly with some other Rarities,
but the vessel miscarrying, you received them not.”
Of the long bill with which it sucketh the sweet substance, the tongue
is the essential feature, so far as sustenance is concerned; consisting
of a long double cylinder, “like a double-barreled gun,” Goodrich
thought—a most convenient instrument for imbibing nectar—flattened and
sometimes barbed at the end, for the capture of the minute insects that
constitute the less æsthetic portion of their nutriment—for it has been
many times demonstrated that, airy and fairy as they are (the size of
the stomach not exceeding the globe of the eye, and scarcely a sixth
part as large as the heart, which, in turn, is remarkably large, nearly
the size of the cranium), they cannot live by ambrosia alone, nor yet by
love, but must vary both with an occasional relish of aphides and
infinitesimal spiders.
Of “that Bird’s two eggs,” Mr. Chapman says: “As far as known, all
hummingbirds lay two white eggs—frail, pearly ellipses—that after ten
days’ incubation develop into a tangle of dark limbs and bodies, which
no one could think of calling birds, much less winged gems.”
It has been a matter of doubt to many whether hummingbirds ever rested
at all or spent their lives in the air exclusively, but Mr. Gould states
authoritatively: “Although many short intermissions of rest are taken
during the day, the bird may be said to live in the air—an element in
which it performs every kind of evolution with the utmost ease,
frequently rising perpendicularly, flying backwards, pirouetting or
dancing off, as it were.”
It was the belief of the Duke of Argyle that no bird could fly backward,
a theory that he stated with emphasis in his Reign of Law, but it has
been proved that he reckoned without “the winglet of the fairy
hummingbird,” which seems to be the exception to prove a reigning law of
Nature.
Montgomery makes of the whole Trochilidæ family this inspired
explanation:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account