Birds and Nature Vol. 11 No. 3 [March 1902]: Illustrated by Color PhotographyVarious
History
Birds and Nature Vol. 11 No. 3 [March 1902]: Illustrated by Color Photography
Various
Birds -- Periodicals; Natural history -- Periodicals
of the human biped, and hold with Eben Holden that “Men are the most
terrible of all critters, an’ the meanest. They’re the only critters
that kill fer fun,” and it has become instinctive for them to act
accordingly.
However, we had not yet arrived at the end of our experience with the
sociable bird world, for it seemed that we were to carry a full cargo of
stowaways, for the next arrivals were six or seven juncos savoring of
frost and wintry weather, notwithstanding the heat of the autumnal sun.
Miss Merriam has quaintly styled these busy little birds: “Gray robed
monks and nuns,” though their character does not cleverly carry out that
conception, for they are a pugnacious lot of feathers and blood, and
there were pitch battles going on at every hatch corner, the juncos
playing the part of the aggressor every time, turning and conspicuously
flaunting their stylish white tail markings in the face of their
opponents. The next advent was that of a tiny house wren, who seemed to
have had a good deal of his natural belligerency blown out of him, and
was content to make a peaceful breakfast on the Canada soldiers that
were swarming about. Wrens are noticeable for the interest that they
take in human belongings, and love to make their home among them. At
Marquette I was shown a nest built in an overshoe inadvertently left in
the crotch of an apple tree, and which, I am glad to report, the owner
left undisturbed when she learned by whom it was pre-empted. I thought
of our little stowaway when I saw the nest and wondered how much he
could have told me of its construction. Some one has mentioned a nest
built in an old coat sleeve, and Audubon tells us of a pair that nested
in his parlor, paying him rent in song music. The wren has also received
much “honorable mention” in history, Aristotle being the first, I
believe, to call him the King of Birds, possibly because of the legend
that tells us that to gain his sovereignty in a trial of flight he
concealed himself on the back of an eagle who was one of the
contestants, and after that bird of mighty wing power had reached his
limit the wren, arising from his seat among the eagle’s feathers, easily
flew much higher, thus gaining the race and title. Perhaps not the first
time that high places have been arrived at through duplicity. But, in
justice to his species, mention should be made of the myth that asserts
that in ye golden time the wren was the only bird brave enough to enter
heaven and bring down fire to earth for the benefit of the mortals. In
this philanthropical work he scorched off his feathers, so the other
birds made a donation party and each contributed some spare feathers to
the singed benefactor (but we notice that their generosity, like that of
some others, was confined to donating their plainest apparel), all but
the owl, who refused to part with a single quill, but who for his
stinginess was at once ostracised from good society, and forced to make
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account