Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
The above instance is given, not because it represents the state of
mind of the average member of Congress, for it does not. It is an
extreme case. But it does give in exaggerated fashion, an indication
of what is the background of feeling and thought among a very large
number of members, though in a much milder and more dilute form. This
particular Congressman may prove to be pugnacious to the last, but the
majority show strong evidence that their fears and inhibitions can
be melted away by the sunlight of wholesome public opinion, frankly
expressed.
It can not be too emphatically stated that the average member of
Congress would probably much rather be reasonable in this matter than
not, but he has not quite reached the point where it is as easy to be
reasonable as it is to be evasive. However, it has not been altogether
rare to find a perfectly untrammelled mind like that of one of the
leading Senators, who sailed into brisk consideration of the bill,
like a fresh breeze on a muggy day; “Of course, I don’t see how anyone
could vote against it.” On being told that some of the Senators on the
Judiciary Committee seemed too inhibited to want the bill reported out,
he said, “H’m,—prudes, are they?” and ran his eye over the list of
Committee members to locate the prudes. “There are Senator So-and-so,
and So-and-so, surely they will be for it,—just plain common sense.”
“And decency,” added the interviewer. “A combination of both, yes.” He
would speak to some of the members. He saw “no reason on earth why it
should not pass.”
As the fear about the young people has been the most persistent of all
fears expressed by members of Congress, and the one about which their
minds have been most rutty, a special answer to it was prepared and
sent to every member of both Houses. _It_ was entitled; “_Yes, but
won’t it increase immorality? Isn’t letting down the bars dangerous?_”
and the substance of it was as follows:
When Congressmen say, “Yes, but won’t this letting down the bars,
mean that the unmarried and the young will have nothing to deter them
from illicit relations?” We, in turn, make these queries:
“Well, will it?”
“Do you really believe that most people have no positive standards of
conduct?”
“Are they kept what is called ‘straight’ only by their ignorance of
the fact that sex relations need not result in parenthood unless so
intended?”
“Is it your sober opinion that fear of ‘results’ and ignorance as
the control of conception are the only deterrents from general
promiscuity?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account