Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
To expect aid or even intelligent understanding of birth control from
the typical Albany politician; to be disappointed because of the
ignorance of these so-called “legislators”; to be discouraged because
of their failure to remove the coercive and criminally obscene insult
to American womanhood from the statute books[3]—this would be to
succumb to emotion rather than to profit by the invaluable knowledge
we have gained from our experience at Albany. The great fact is this.
We can expect nothing from the politician of today. If we must use
the weapon of politics to further the progress of birth control, it
must be the politics created by ourselves.
When the first birth control clinic in America was declared a “public
nuisance” by the courts, we were advised by well-meaning friends
that the legal way, the political way, the legislative way, was the
only safe and sane method of propaganda. This has now been put to
the test. And we discover that the successful politician is not only
mentally unable to understand the aim of birth control, but moreover
he himself is the very product of those sinister forces we are aiming
to eradicate from human society.
Your successful politician is the demagogue who knows the best tricks
to catch the greatest number of votes. He is the hypnotist of great,
docile, submissive, sheep-like majorities. He is interested in
number, not intelligence. Therefore to expect such masters, who by
hook or crook, ride roughshod into public office or slide into seats
of the State Legislature to understand or support a program which
aims at the creation of self-reliant, self-governing,[4] independent
men and women, would be to neglect one of the most important factors
among the resources of our opponents. But we did expect something
more among men elected to public office than the embarrassed giggle
of the adolescent, the cynical indecency of the gangster, in the
consideration of a serious sexual and social problem.
Perhaps, moreover, we failed to take into consideration the vast
power wielded today by the politician in control and administration
of the public charities, hospitals, and “correctional” institutions
for the support and maintenance of the victims of compulsory
motherhood.
“Our politicians today profit from human misery. They have an
interest, direct or indirect, in the production through uncontrolled
fecundity, of the unfit, the underfed, the feebleminded and the
incurably diseased. Their interest, financially, is in the increase
of our institution populations, with their insistent demands for
appropriations from the City and State. Most eugenists dub the
victims of our legal and social barbarism “the unfit.” The victims
are not the “unfit” but these blind leaders of the blind—the
politician, the profiteer, the war-making patriot, the criminal
moralist, who is urging men and women to “increase and multiply.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account