Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
Statements of this sort were repeatedly made at public meetings for a
number of years. They came to be so widely circulated that they were
generally accepted among many of the groups which were agitating for
social revolution or reconstruction, without much of any analysis to
find out whether or not they were an accurate interpretation of the
opposition of “politics” to changing the laws affecting birth control
information. It is perhaps not strange that this sort of talk became
common, but it had two serious disadvantages, one that it shot wide
of the mark, and the other that it served to increase the prejudice
of law makers against the whole program for correcting the laws, and
added perceptibly to their distaste for taking a personal part in that
program.
Every bit of direct experience with legislators augments the conclusion
that the chief reason the individual legislator hangs back is because
he is afraid it will “queer him” to stand for any action, and the
reason that “political leaders” advise the legislators to let the
subject alone is precisely the same. The subject is embarrassing,
that’s all. As one of them advised another, “Whatever you do, don’t get
mixed up in any sex stuff. No man in politics can afford that.”
A striking proof of the foregoing point was an occurrence in the
presidential campaign in 1920. Senator Harding, when a member of the
Public Health Committee of the Senate (since abolished) had written
to the Director of Voluntary Parenthood League saying, “I have not
had time to study carefully the provisions of your bill, but at first
reading I find myself very much inclined in its favor.” This statement
was given to the press. Presently it was taken up by some of the
opposition campaign speakers who ran short of thunder, and they began
spreading the news that if Harding were elected president, “government
means would be used to enforce birth control.” No details were given
but it was insinuated that the project would be an unheard of intrusion
into private life. A representative from the Democratic Headquarters
was sent to the office of the Voluntary Parenthood League to secure a
photostat copy of the note which Mr. Harding had written. The young
man who bore the message happened to be interested in the work of
the League, and he frankly admitted that the errand was distasteful
to him, as the distorted use it was planned to make of this note was
such as would not only reflect discredit upon Mr. Harding, but upon
the League. He said he considered it most unwise campaign tactics,
and he was the more disturbed over it, because some of the campaign
managers had admitted that they themselves approved the bill, but
as they considered it a good handle for slurring Harding, they were
perfectly willing to use it in that manner for campaign purposes. Their
plan, however, was checkmated by some of the levelheaded women then
active in the Democratic campaign; they instantly notified the men
that it would never, never do.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account