Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
They reminded the men that no matter
how relatively silent the organized women of the country might have
been on this subject, there was no doubt whatever that they believed in
controlled parenthood; obviously, for they had achieved it; and any
discreditable slam at birth control would be nothing but a boomerang
for the Democratic campaigners. The whole idea was promptly abandoned.
It has been frequently said, inside of Congress and out, that if the
“club women” had endorsed the Cummins-Vaile Bill, it would have been
passed by the last Congress. There is clearly no way to prove it, but
there are certain facts to be stated which throw some light on the
subject. In the first place the club women have not been completely
silent. In the next place, it is just as obvious that the club women
believe in the control of parenthood as that Congressmen do, and that
they have not and will not observe the laws which forbid access to the
information. The birth rate in both groups is prima facie evidence,
which no candid person would deny, as it is out of the question to
assume that the educated and more or less privileged class to which
both groups belong, are made up of people who are for the most part
either ascetic or sterile. The only possible inference is that control
of the growth of the family has been achieved by the utilization of
contraceptive knowledge. Congressmen are just as able to take note of
this situation as any other observers, but when they talk of waiting
for the club women to voice their opinions officially in a body, they
are merely exercising their ingenuity in thinking up one more form of
excuse for not acting.
And the women, to the extent that have been backward about
acknowledging what their lives prove, seem to be motivated by exactly
the same sort of embarrassments and inhibitions as afflict the members
of Congress. And similarly also, their inhibitions are wearing thinner
all the time, and there is good reason to believe that ere long the
organized women who belong to the more or less privileged class will
follow the lead of the organized labor women who, in June, 1922, passed
the following resolution at the annual convention of the National
Women’s Trade Union League:
_Whereas_ the effect of certain laws of the United States, both State
and Federal, is to withhold contraceptive information from the women
of the working classes, while it is in most cases readily available
to the well to do; and
_Whereas_ it is important that in this, as in other matters, the best
scientific information should be available to the peoples’ need,
regardless of their economic standing: Therefore be it
_Resolved_, That we, the National Women’s Trade-Union League, in
convention assembled, go on record as opposed to all laws, State and
Federal, which in effect establish censorship over knowledge which,
if open to one, should be open to all who care to secure it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account