Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
The consensus of opinion at both conferences was against all “doctors
only” types of legislation and for straight freedom for science.
The doctors as a whole were of the opinion that an unencumbered
clean repeal of the contraceptive prohibition laws would give the
medical profession a larger chance to serve the public well than
any other proposed measure. The lawyers emphasized the fact that no
possible statutes can guarantee sound instruction for the public,
that only education can approximate that result, and law can not and
must not prescribe education. The conferences even advised against
the protective section of the Cummins-Vaile Bill, as inadequate and
sure to be meaningless in many instances of its application. There
was general opinion that the existing Food and Drug Act will apply
effectively to suppress fraudulent contraceptives, when the ban against
the circulation of contraceptives is removed. These conferences were
reported in the Birth Control Herald, from which the following excerpts
giving salient points are taken.
The “doctors only” type of legislation heretofore has had sincere
approval from a considerable number of physicians who were
unquestionably beyond the appeal of mere money making, in the giving
of contraceptive instructions. They were bent upon having good
methods taught, knowing full well how harmful and fraudulent methods
are being secretly and illegally circulated at present.
But now, while there is far more medical interest and conscience
than ever before regarding the need for authentic instruction, there
is also a very widespread conclusion that the so-called “doctors
only” type of legislation would be not only futile as a means of
accomplishing what the best doctors most want, but that it would
actually stand in the way of their giving to the public the service
they would like to render.
The doctors have buckled down to considering the question of
legislation as never before, and in co-operation with some of the
best lawyers, the conclusion has been reached that the simple clean
repeal of the words “preventing conception” is the best and biggest
thing to be done, and that the Cummins-Vaile Bill should consist of
just that and nothing more.
* * * * *
The physicians present at the Chicago conference were Dr. William
Allen Pusey, President of the American Medical Association, Dr.
Herman Adler, Dr. Charles Bacon, Dr. Raphael Yarros, Dr. John Favill,
President of the Mississippi Branch of the American Birth Control
League, and Dr. Clara Davis, head of the Pediatric Division of the
Mt. Sinai Hospital in Cleveland.
Discussion was informal, but to the point. The boiled down sense of
the meeting was in favor of the straight repeal to remove the subject
from the obscenity statutes, leaving the protection of the public to
education by the medical profession, and the Food and Drug Act.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account