Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
All the chief propositions for securing substantial protection by
legislation were taken up and found wanting. They were turned down as
illusive and inadequate, and even as stumbling blocks to progress.
* * * * *
Dr. Pusey, whose forthright views on birth control became widely
known when he discussed the subject in his presidential address
before the Convention of the A. M. A. last June, greatly aided
clear thinking on the question of legislation. He said the main
point in the Cummins-Vaile Bill was the chief thing to accomplish,
that is, the removal of the subject from the obscenity laws. He did
not wish to say definitely that no sort of protective legislation
was a possibility, for he had not had the time to consider all the
alternatives to the vanishing point.
But he did lay down some general principles. He said the chief
thing to remember is that all sorts of miserable, inadequate and
even dangerous contraceptive information is going the rounds _now_,
in spite of the absolutely sweeping prohibition of the Comstock
law; that no real attempt is being made to stop it legally, and
that no such attempt will ever be made. If there is such wholesale
law-breaking now, it stands to reason that no sort of “doctors only”
laws could be enforced. They would only serve to deceive the public.
He said great care must be taken to avoid any more “silly laws” or
laws that can not be enforced. “We have too many of those already.”
* * * * *
Members of the Executive Committee and a representative group of
doctors and lawyers, combined their efforts, in person and by letter
at the Headquarters of the Voluntary Parenthood League, to solve the
question of protective legislation.
* * * * *
After discussion from all angles and earnest effort for the best,
the conference voted to reaffirm the main point of the Cummins-Vaile
Bill, i.e., the clean removal of the words “preventing conception”
from the five Federal statutes where it occurs; and to recommend the
withdrawal of the present five-doctor certification section; and to
appoint a committee of three to re-investigate the present Food and
Drug Act, with power to draft an amendment specifically covering
contraceptives, if such were deemed necessary. The Committee chosen
was Mr. Engelhard, Chairman, Dr. D. George Fournad and Mrs. Dennett,
thus representing the legal and medical professions and the League.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account