Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them — John Shaqi
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
_How it came about that information concerning one item of science
became a criminal indecency: Anthony Comstock’s blundering bequest
to the people: Congress an unwitting partner: States hastily
followed suit: United States the only country to class contraceptive
information with penalized indecency: Legislation aimed at indecency
but hit science: Europe laughs at our “Comstockery”: Documentary
proof that Comstock and his successor, Sumner, did not expect
laws to prevent doctors from giving and normal people from using
contraceptive instructions._
“The evil that men do lives after them,”—likewise their stupidity and
blunders. For over half a century the people of the United States have
been the victims of a great error which Anthony Comstock and Congress
unwittingly committed in connection with their commendable effort to
free the young people of the country from contamination by those who
were then trafficking extensively in smutty literature and inducements
to sex perversion.
Their error in judgment was to include in Section 211 of the Penal Code
the two words “preventing conception.” In their eagerness to abolish
the promotion of the misuse of contraceptive knowledge in connection
with morbid and irregular practices, they rashly framed the law so as
to forbid all circulation of any knowledge whatever, thus making it in
the eyes of the law just as much a crime for high-minded responsible
married people to learn how to space the births in their families
wisely, as for the low, vicious or perverted few to spread information
about how to abuse this knowledge in abnormal, unwholesome ways.
The Congressional Record of the short session of Congress which ended
on March fourth, 1873, shows beyond any reasonable doubt that Anthony
Comstock himself had no intention of penalizing _normal_ birth control
information. He was simply so bent upon wiping out the shocking
commerce in pornographic literature which disgraced that period that
he rushed headlong into the question of legislation without due
consideration as to the results, which have made the United States the
laughing stock of Europeans, and which have even prevented the lawful
circulation of medical works for the medical profession.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account