Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
_Sen. Frelinghuysen of N. J._ (Member of Health Com.) Frankly said
he would be “afraid” to do it, but he feels favorably toward the
bill.
_Sen. Owen of Okla._ (Member of Health Com.) Like Senator France,
author of bill for Federal Health Dept.—unqualifiedly in favor,
but sure bill should not be sponsored from Democratic side.
Dec. 31. Proposed to Senator France that the bill be introduced by
the Health Committee without individual sponsorship.
[Sidenote: 1921.]
Jan. 5. Senator France declined the proposition on the ground that
the burden of the bill would fall on him just the same.
Jan. 13. After thorough consultation with Senator France, took bill
back to Senator Sterling.
Jan. 27. Senator Sterling answered that he was “too busy to do it at
this session.”
Feb. 11. Senator Kenyon was asked to reconsider. He replied, “I’m
mighty sorry, but I am just loaded down with bills that are taking
every minute of my time, and I must ask you to secure some other
Senator to take care of this legislation for you.”
Mar. 1. Senator Borah was asked to sponsor the bill. He did not see
his way to doing it.
Aug. 19. Post Master General Hays had put himself on record as not
believing in the maintenance of Post Office censorship laws. He was
accordingly asked to consider recommending to Congress the removal
of the censorship law regarding birth control knowledge. He was
most hospitable to the suggestion—said it was timely, that he was
interested and had about come to the conclusion that he ought to ask
Congress to revise all the laws bearing on Post Office censorship
power. He asked for a compilation of pertinent data, which was
promptly provided. He had the matter under consideration till he
resigned office the following March. But he made no recommendation to
Congress.
The sponsor hunt began again.
Senator Borah suggested the possibility that he might slip in our bill
as an amendment to the bill proposing to extend Post Office censorship
to information about race track betting tips, if it was reported out of
committee and reached the floor for discussion. The bill was killed in
Committee, due in part to Senator Borah’s opposition to it.
[Sidenote: 1922.]
Dec. Sponsors found in both Houses. Senator Cummins in the Senate,
and Congressman John Kissel of New York in the House. The latter
responded to a circular letter asking for a volunteer statesman for
the task.
[Sidenote: 1923.]
Jan. 10. Bill introduced in both Houses.
Jan. 22. Sen. Nelson, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee appointed
Sub-Committee of three to consider the bill—Senators Cummins, Colt
and Ashurst. Senator Cummins was ill and went to Florida. Committee
action was stalled.
Strenuous effort was made to get substitute Chairman so action
could proceed. Norris was added to Committee but not as Chairman.
Feb. 6. Sen. Colt declined to act as Chairman.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account