Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
Feb. 8. Sen. Colt asked to be excused from the Committee.
Feb. 13. Sen. Cummins returned.
Feb. 19. Sen. Cummins tried to get vote of full Judiciary, as
conditions had not permitted a Hearing and report from the
Sub-Committee. Meeting adjourned without action. They “did not get to
the bill.”
Feb. 26. Sen. Cummins tried again to get a vote. Announced that he
would call for it before adjournment, again. The members slipped out
one by one, so no quorum was present. The Senator said, “They just
faded away.”
[Sidenote: 1924.]
Jan. 30. Bill reintroduced by Senator Cummins.
Feb. 1. Bill introduced in House by Congressman William N. Vaile of
Colorado.
Mar. 7. Bill referred to Senate Sub-Committee, consisting of Senators
Spencer, Norris and Overman.
Mar. 22. Bill referred to House Sub-Committee of seven, Congressmen
Yates, Hersey, Perlman, Larson, Thomas, Major and O’Sullivan.
Apr. 8. Joint Hearing held before both Sub-Committees. Ten spoke for
the bill, and five against.
May 9. Hearing reopened at request of the Catholics.
June 7. Congress adjourned. Neither Committee reported the bill.
[Sidenote: 1925.]
Dec. Senator Cummins made Chairman of the Judiciary Committee.
Jan. 20. Senate Sub-Committee unanimously reported Cummins-Vaile Bill
“without recommendation.”
House Sub-Committee evaded making a report.
Mar. 4. Congress adjourned.
APPENDIX NO. 13
SENATORS BORAH AND STANLEY ARGUED BEFORE THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IN
1921 FOR THE PRINCIPLES ON WHICH THE CUMMINS-VAILE BILL IS BASED, BUT
REGARDING ANOTHER BILL
The following excerpts from the Hearing, with editorial comment, are
taken from the Birth Control Herald of January 20, 1925.
The Bill on which the Hearing was held had passed the House in
October, 1921. It aimed primarily to make race track betting tips
unmailable, but section No. 5 to which Senators Stanley and Borah
objected most strenuously was a sweeping infringement of the freedom
of the press, by which nothing could go through the mails that
gives any information as to bets or wagers on any contest of speed,
strength or skill. The bill was referred to a Sub-Committee of the
Judiciary consisting of Senator Sterling, Chairman, and Senators
Borah and Overman.
The measure has never been reported out by the full committee, and
it seems evident that the vigorous opposition of the two Senators
who argued on principle, and the disapproval of powerful newspaper
associations, have resulted in the burying of the bill.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account