Bishop Joseph Blount Cheshire: His Life and WorkLondon, Lawrence Foushee
Religion
Bishop Joseph Blount Cheshire: His Life and Work
London, Lawrence Foushee
Cheshire, Joseph Blount, 1850-1932
Although Cheshire devoted most of his time and energy to St. Peter's
parish and its missions, he did not neglect his duty to the Diocese. He
attended all of the diocesan conventions and took an active and
significant part in their deliberations. Probably the most important
action taken by any convention during his ministry was that relating to
the division of the Diocese. The question of dividing the church in
North Carolina into two dioceses had been discussed from time to time by
the conventions since the election in 1873 of Bishop Lyman as assistant
bishop. Bishop Atkinson had favored a division at one time, but when the
question was placed squarely before the convention of 1877, he came out
strongly against it. The large number of clergy and laity who favored
division dropped the proposal for the time-being out of deference to
Bishop Atkinson, who, they felt, did not have much longer to serve. Upon
his death in January, 1881, the question was again brought forward. At
the convention of 1882, held in Calvary Church, Tarboro, Dr. M. M.
Marshall, rector of Christ Church, Raleigh, introduced resolutions
declaring the sentiment of the people on division and calling for a
committee to consider proposals for the erection of a new diocese. The
convention approved Dr. Marshall's resolutions, and the Bishop appointed
a special committee to report upon the subject.
After some study of the proposal this committee submitted a majority
report calling for a division of the Diocese. Bishop Lyman, who during
Bishop Atkinson's life-time had advocated the formation of a new
diocese, now reversed his position. Upon hearing the report of the
special committee, the Bishop delivered "an impassioned attack upon the
report."[19] The opposition of the Bishop led to a long and, at times,
acrimonious discussion. When the question was finally voted upon, the
committee's report was adopted by a large majority of the clergy and
laity. The convention appointed a committee of clergymen and laymen to
confer with the Bishop upon the details of the division, to obtain his
consent, and to report to the next diocesan convention. Cheshire was
made a member of this committee.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account