Bishop Joseph Blount Cheshire: His Life and Work — John Shaqi
Bishop Joseph Blount Cheshire: His Life and WorkLondon, Lawrence Foushee
Religion
Bishop Joseph Blount Cheshire: His Life and Work
London, Lawrence Foushee
Cheshire, Joseph Blount, 1850-1932
From the General Convention of 1895 to that of 1931, Bishop Cheshire
attended every triennial meeting of this body. In the first three or
four conventions, he did not take an active part in the discussions of
the House of Bishops. For that matter, he never participated as
prominently in its deliberations as some of the other bishops. At the
1895 convention he was appointed to the committees on the Admission of
New Dioceses and on the Consecration of Bishops, and at the next
triennial meeting he was made a member of the Joint Commission on the
Revision of the Constitution and Canons. This last appointment pleased
him, since it was the kind of work for which he was well prepared. His
legal training influenced his partiality for this type of work. In 1904
he was appointed to the Committee on Canons, on which he served for
almost every convention until his death. As a member of this committee
he made his most important contribution to the work of the General
Convention. It will be recalled that it was in this capacity that he had
done his best work in the diocesan conventions. From time to time he was
made a member of other regular and special committees.
When Bishop Cheshire assumed the office of bishop of the Diocese of
North Carolina, he felt it his duty to exercise the full authority of
that office. In deciding upon this course of action he did not intend to
be arbitrary or despotic in administering the Diocese, although at times
some clergymen and laymen seemed to think so. But when they became
better acquainted with him and his methods, they admired and respected
him the more. The Bishop had a forthright, and sometimes decidedly
blunt, manner of speaking, which, to those who did not know him so well,
seemed arbitrary or overbearing. He had disagreements with his
clergymen, but they felt that they could always count upon receiving a
fair hearing from him. When the Bishop realized he was in error upon any
point, no one was quicker than he to admit it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account