Bishop Joseph Blount Cheshire: His Life and WorkLondon, Lawrence Foushee
Religion
Bishop Joseph Blount Cheshire: His Life and Work
London, Lawrence Foushee
Cheshire, Joseph Blount, 1850-1932
At the opening of the twentieth century one of the most important
questions facing the Episcopal Church in the South was the separation of
the Negro work in each diocese from that of the white. Bishop Cheshire
was strongly opposed to any separation of the church's work founded
solely on the racial feeling. He disliked to see the unity of the
Diocese disrupted, and believed the ideal situation was "a church and a
diocese which in its annual gatherings should represent visibly the
oneness of all races and colors in Christ."[50] He realized, however,
that he could not be guided entirely by his personal feelings on a
question of such importance. A large body of the Negro clergy and many
white churchmen throughout the South felt that the welfare of the church
demanded some sort of separate organization for the colored work.
When he met his diocesan convention in the spring of 1907, Bishop
Cheshire announced his position on this question. Since the colored
people seemed to desire an organization of their own, he believed the
time had come for the church to take some definite action. He asked the
convention to make known its views on the question of separation, since
it would come up for discussion in the General Convention that fall. The
Bishop stated that two plans of organization for the Negroes were being
considered. One provided for the consecration of suffragan bishops who
should have charge of the colored clergy and laity and should be under
the diocesan bishop. The other called for the consecration of missionary
bishops who should have charge of the colored work in contiguous
dioceses and who should be responsible to the General Convention. The
Bishop declared that he was heartily in favor of the latter plan,
believing that it met the needs of existing conditions much more justly
and adequately than the former. Moreover, the colored people themselves
seemed to favor the plan of using missionary bishops. If they were used
they would be under the direct control of the General Convention and
would be given more independence than suffragan bishops, who would be
under the administrative jurisdiction of the white diocesan bishop.
Bishop Cheshire felt that if the colored work was to be made independent
of the white, the Negro bishops should be given some administrative as
well as spiritual responsibilities.
When the convention took up the question of the colored work, it
referred the whole matter to a special committee. After careful study,
the committee recommended that the Negroes be given a separate
organization, that the plan of missionary bishops be adopted, and that
the deputies from the Diocese should present these recommendations to
the General Convention. The committee's report was adopted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account