Bishop Joseph Blount Cheshire: His Life and WorkLondon, Lawrence Foushee
Religion
Bishop Joseph Blount Cheshire: His Life and Work
London, Lawrence Foushee
Cheshire, Joseph Blount, 1850-1932
At the General Convention, which met in the fall of 1907, the Conference
of Church Workers among Colored People presented a memorial in which it
advocated a separate organization for the Negroes and the election of
suffragan bishops. A joint committee of the House of Bishops and the
House of Deputies, of which Bishop Cheshire was made a member, was
appointed to consider the memorial. This committee recommended the
adoption of the principal features of the memorial. Bishop Cheshire and
one other member of the committee presented a minority report in which
they urged the use of missionary bishops. Their report was defeated in
the House of Bishops by a vote of fifty to thirty-four, while that of
the majority was carried, forty-five to thirty-three. After the defeat
of his proposal, Bishop Cheshire voted for the majority's report,
believing it preferable to no action on the subject.
The question of the racial episcopate was, however, far from being
settled. During the next three meetings of the General Convention Bishop
Cheshire and a few others continued to work for the adoption of the plan
of missionary bishops. In 1913 they succeeded in getting the plan
approved by the House of Bishops, but it was defeated by the House of
Deputies. The southern bishops and clergy were the most undecided as to
what plan they wanted to put into effect. Up to 1918 the Diocese of
North Carolina had taken no action towards electing a suffragan bishop
for the colored work. In 1917 Bishop Cheshire advised his diocesan
convention to consider the question. The next year the convention voted
to proceed to the election of a suffragan bishop.
Before nominations for the office were called for, Bishop Cheshire
gathered together the colored clergy and laity of the convention for an
informal discussion. He told them that, in his opinion, Rev. Henry B.
Delany, who was then archdeacon of the colored convocation, was the best
man for the office. Rev. M. A. Barber strongly represented the
qualifications of the Rev. Mr. Baskerville, who had been recommended by
Bishop Guerry, of South Carolina. Mr. Delany then withdrew from the
conference, and Bishop Cheshire asked the colored clergy to express
themselves frankly on their preference. Every one of them expressed the
opinion that, while they thought Baskerville was an excellent man, they
did not think he could compare with Delany in qualifications for the
office of bishop. Of this unanimity of opinion, Bishop Cheshire
remarked: "It was something of a surprise to me—for I really did not
know how strong their feelings were."
When the convention proceeded to the election of a suffragan bishop,
Delany was the only man nominated. He received every vote of the clergy
and laity. When he was presented to the convention and asked to say a
few words, he simply remarked: "I cannot speak. I cannot utter what I
feel. I thank you." Bishop Cheshire characterized his laconic expression
as "about the best speech he could possibly have made."[51]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account