Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 63, No. 390, April, 1848 — John Shaqi
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 63, No. 390, April, 1848Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 63, No. 390, April, 1848
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
BLACKWOOD’S
EDINBURGH MAGAZINE.
NO. CCCXC. APRIL, 1848. VOL. LXIII.
CONTENTS.
FALL OF THE THRONE OF THE BARRICADES, 393
A GERMAN DITTY, 419
TWO SONNETS, 420
MY ROUTE INTO CANADA, 425
THE CONQUEST OF NAPLES, 436
TRAVELLING IN TAFFYLAND, 455
LIFE AND TIMES OF LORD HARDWICKE, 463
HOW WE GOT POSSESSION OF THE TUILLERIES, 484
THE CAXTONS: A FAMILY PICTURE. Part I., 513
EDINBURGH:
WILLIAM BLACKWOOD AND SONS, 45, GEORGE STREET;
AND 37, PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON.
_To whom all Communications (post paid) must be addressed._
SOLD BY ALL THE BOOKSELLERS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM.
PRINTED BY WILLIAM BLACKWOOD AND SONS, EDINBURGH.
BLACKWOOD’S
EDINBURGH MAGAZINE.
NO. CCCXC. APRIL, 1848. VOL. LXIII.
FALL OF THE THRONE OF THE BARRICADES.
“Deus patiens quia Æternus.”—ST AUGUSTIN.
Eighteen years ago, when the throne of Charles X. was overturned amidst
the universal exultation of the liberal party in this country, we
ventured, amidst the general transports, to arraign the policy and
condemn the morality of the change. We pleaded strongly, in several
articles,[1] that that great event foreboded nothing but a long series
of calamities to France and to Europe; that liberty had been rendered
impossible in a country which, casting aside all the bonds of religion
and loyalty, had left no other foundation for government but force; and
that the external peace of the Continent would be put in imminent peril
by an ardent military population, heated by the successful issue of one
great revolt, placed in the midst of monarchies in which the feudal
institutions and chivalrous feelings were still in ascendency. We
doubted the stability of a government founded on the success of one
well-organised urban insurrection: we distrusted the fidelity of men who
had begun their career by treachery and treason. Nominally the
aggressor, we concluded that Charles X. was really on the defensive; he
attempted a _coup d’état_, because government in any other way had
become impossible. We were told in reply, that these were antiquated and
exploded ideas; that the revolution was necessary to save the liberties
of France from destruction; that a new era had opened upon mankind with
the fire of the Barricades; that loyalty was no longer required when the
interest of mankind to be well governed was generally felt; and that a
throne surrounded by republican institutions was the best form of
government, and the only one in which the monarchical principle could
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account