Great Britain, without the
slightest hope of any return, had impoverished herself for the support
of the Irish, and yet here was the whole acknowledgment! Even on the
score of policy it would have been wiser for Mr O’Connell to have
mitigated his tone.
The Irish Crime and Outrage Bill was introduced by ministers at an early
stage of the session, with the general concurrence of all parties. No
one could doubt that it was especially needed, but few were sanguine
that it would suffice to cure the spirit of disaffection which was
abroad. In fact, Irish agitation has been allowed to proceed to such a
point, that the evil is utterly incurable. What chance is there of
putting a stop to physical force demonstrations, or, in other words, to
open rebellion, whilst another gang of demagogues is permitted to preach
sedition under the guise of moral force, and to fill the minds of their
deluded victims with every species of misrepresentation and wild
hostility to Great Britain? Our system of government towards Ireland has
been timid and weak, and we are now paying the penalty. Our charities
have been given with far too liberal a hand. Ireland has but had to ask,
in order to be relieved by the public money: and this process has been
so often repeated, that what at first was an extraordinary boon, is now
considered in the light of an indefeasible claim. The Irish peasant will
not work, will do nothing to better his own position, because he
believes that, in his hour of need, he will be supported by British
alms. We wish we could believe that this scandalous and sordid spirit
was confined to the peasantry alone. It is not so. A general scramble
takes place on each fresh issue of bounty, and rich and poor, high and
low, among the repealers, press clamorously forward for their share.
Never was money more absurdly, more mischievously misapplied, than the
great government grants on occasion of the famine. Had the proposals of
Lord George Bentinck been agreed to, and the money given by way of loan
for construction of the Irish railroads, not only would the government
have held some security for repayment, or, at all events, a vested
interest in the works, but a useful improvement would have been effected
in the heart of the country, and a new element of civilisation
introduced. But the scheme was rejected, for no other reason, we
believe, than because it was suggested by a political opponent, and the
millions granted by Britain have been squandered in making good roads
bad, in trenching mosses, draining waste lands, and what not. The
expenditure has been lost to this country, and has not had the effect of
awakening the slightest spark of gratitude or respect for the quarter
whence it came. Ireland must be disabused on one point. These grants are
not annual, and cannot be continued. The time has come when Ireland must
be put upon precisely the same footing of taxation with the sister
kingdoms—she must be forced to forego pauperism, and in future to rely
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account