parliament, as will agitate and move the colonies to their very heart’s
core,—one party to secure a majority in favour of their “annexation” to
the States, the other to prevent the dismemberment of their mother
country? Sir Robert Peel and others have thrown out such suggestions
before; but, under existing circumstances, if they are again put forth,
they will be regarded by the “annexation movement” party as an
invitation to test the opinions of the colonies—to proselytise them, as
in fact they are now doing, into insurrection, and away from allegiance
to Britain. Meetings will follow; _the stars and stripes_ will be
hoisted by one party; the flag of their forefathers by the other; and,
take my word for it, you will hear of struggles of which God only can
tell the end, and what they may lead to here and elsewhere. Certainly
the world will never have witnessed such a scene. The statesmen, the
cabinet even of Britain playing into the hands of those who would tear
down her flag in America; and her loyal children supporting it against
the influence of many who are, and have been, surrounding the throne.
A long residence in the colonies, and a habit of observing, unbiassed by
colonial party considerations, the character and tendencies of men and
measures, have enabled me to judge, with some accuracy, of the effects
of causes not generally supposed to be pregnant with important results.
At this moment there are, in my judgment, the slumbering elements of a
deadly strife in the colonies. There is but a small remove between a
civil revolution and a physical struggle. The seeds of the national and
revolutionary hurricane are often sown in the peaceful closet, and by
men who could weep over the thought of what they would produce. The
seeds of a wild and fearful hurricane in the colonies, and which must
and will reach England, may be now sowing in many a peaceful closet in
England. Mr Cobden may talk of peace, and denuding Britain of her
national defences, and convincing men against all humanity’s experience;
but he must be, he should be, made aware, that he has not made Britain,
and may not be allowed to unmake her. He has not added these colonies to
her crown; and while he may be in words _twaddling_ about universal
peace, his very speeches may be sowing the seeds here of a deadly
struggle. Let him beware; let others beware of the vanity of free-trade
success. The wisdom of the Manchester school has not been that which has
made Great Britain. Let its vanity and its arrogance not ruin her. If it
arms treason here—if it wings a storm, from which England may learn
much, it may be taught to feel what it has done. The demagogues of
Athens succeeded in banishing the great and the just, but they did not
succeed in destroying greatness or justice—these are immortal. The
free-trade party may denude Britain of her glorious possessions in
America, but these possessions may be the rising, growing, unending
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account