Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
Burley’s voice swelled—“Light!” He turned from Leonard, and again
contemplated the little flame. “In the fixed star, in the
Will-o’-the-wisp, in the great sun that illumes half a world, or the
farthing rushlight by which the ragged student strains his eyes—still
the same flower of the elements. Light in the universe, thought in the
soul—ay—ay—Go on with the simile. My head swims. Extinguish the light!
You cannot; fool, it vanishes from your eye, but it is still in the
space. Worlds must perish, suns shrivel up, matter and spirit both fall
into nothingness, before the combinations whose union makes that little
flame, which the breath of a babe can restore to darkness, shall lose
the power to unite into light once more. Lose the power!—no, the
_necessity_:—it is the one _Must_ in creation. Ay, ay, very dark riddles
grow clear now—now when I could not cast up an addition sum in the
baker’s bill! What wise man denied that two and two made four? Do they
not make four? I can’t answer him. But I could answer a question that
some wise men have contrived to make much knottier.” He smiled softly,
and turned his face for some minutes to the wall.
This was the second night on which Leonard had watched by his bedside,
and Burley’s state had grown rapidly worse. He could not last many days,
perhaps many hours. But he had evinced an emotion beyond mere delight at
seeing Leonard again. He had since then been calmer, more himself. “I
feared I might have ruined you by my bad example,” he said, with a touch
of humour that became pathos as he added, “That idea preyed on me.”
“No, no; you did me great good.”
“Say that—say it often,” said Burley, earnestly; “it makes my heart feel
so light.”
He had listened to Leonard’s story with deep interest, and was fond of
talking to him of little Helen. He detected the secret at the young
man’s heart, and cheered the hopes that lay there, amidst fears and
sorrows. Burley never talked seriously of his repentance; it was not in
his nature to talk seriously of the things which he felt solemnly. But
his high animal spirits were quenched with the animal power that fed
them. Now, we go out of our sensual existence only when we are no longer
enthralled by the Present, in which the senses have their realm. The
sensual being vanishes when we are in the Past or the Future. The
Present was gone from Burley; he could no more be its slave and its
king.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account