Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
But we must not become political. So, gentlemen, “the memory of Hampden”
in any kind of beer you choose, from the smallest to the stiffest;—and
now to our present subject. We are very sorry indeed to observe that the
taste in champagne—a wine which we hold in much reverence—is becoming
hideously depraved in this country. We do not speak merely of
England—England can look after herself, and Cyrus Redding is a safe
monitor on such subjects, who, we trust, will make strong head against
national depreciation. Sparkling Hock and petillating Moselle may be
tolerated, though we do not like them; and we have no objection to St
Peray as an agreeable companion to a cutlet. But, latterly, some
superlative trash has made its appearance among us under such names as
the Ruby and the Garnet; and we would earnestly recommend all good
Christians who have a regard for their stomachs to avoid these. The fact
is, that there is no tolerable medium in the quality of the wines of
Champagne. Either they are first-rate, in order to secure which you had
best stick to the established names, or they are not one whit preferable
to Perry. A conservative taste in wines is likely to be the most
correct. Adhere to the ancient vineyards, and have nothing to do with
newfangled fluids, however puffed or recommended. If you want to know
how these are made, listen to Mr Reach, whose fine palate enabled him at
once to detect the slightest touch of adulteration. Young men are apt to
be led astray by the splendour of novel names, and to believe in the
possibility of the discovery of new vineyards. They cannot resist an
imposition, if it is paraded before them with proper pomp and dignity.
Some years ago a nondescript species of liquor, bad enough to perpetuate
the cholera in a province, was received with considerable approbation,
because it bore the high-sounding name of “Œil de Montmorenci.” We
always distrust in wines those poetical and chivalresque titles. From
this condemnation, however, we would specially exclude “Beaujolais de
Fleury,” a delicious liquor, which might have beseemed the cup of old
King Réné of Provence. But your Œil de Montmorencis, your Chateau
Chastelheraults, and your Sang de St Simeons, with other similar
ptisans, are neither more nor less than the concoction of those
ingenious troubadours, the wine-fabricators of Cette.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account