Hitherto we have adverted mainly, for the benefit of those who are
untried in the ways of the Moor and the Loch, to the earlier sports of
the season; because we are in favour of what Dandie Dinmont termed a
“regular entering,” and have no idea of dispensing with principles at
the commencement of the sportsman’s career. Old hands know perfectly
well what is before them. Such a work as this, which we are reviewing,
may possibly confirm some of their theories, or it may reveal to them
the cause—especially in winter shooting—of some errors into which they
may have inadvertently fallen from too slight notice of the habits and
peculiar sensitiveness of their game. Mr Colquhoun’s observations on
this point are peculiarly valuable; for, dwelling on the banks of one of
the most beautiful of our Scottish lochs, he has had ample opportunity
to study the movements of the aquatic birds which congregate there in
the winter season. The reader must not expect to find such narratives of
wholesale slaughter among ducks and widgeon as embellish the pages of
Colonel Hawker. Punt-shooting is limited to the sea-shores and harbours;
and we can readily conceive it to be an exciting occupation for those
who are hardy enough to take the mud at midnight, regardless of the
state of the thermometer. But duck-shooting, on a Highland loch,
partakes more of the nature of stalking, and calls forth in an eminent
degree the skill and resources of the hunter.
“Having now equipped our wildfowl shooter, we will again bring him to
the shore. His first object should be to see his game without being
seen himself, even if they are at too great a distance to show signs
of alarm. To effect this he must creep cautiously forward to the first
point that will command a view of the shore for some distance; then,
taking out his glass, he must reconnoitre it by inches, noticing every
tuft of grass or stone, to which wildfowl asleep often bear so close a
resemblance, that, except to a very quick eye, assisted by a glass,
the difference is not perceptible. If the loch be well-frequented, he
will most likely first discover a flock of divers, but must not be in
a hurry to pocket his glass, until he has thoroughly inspected the
shore, in case some more desirable fowl may be feeding or asleep upon
it. I will suppose that he sees some objects that _may_ be wildfowl.
Let him then immediately direct his glass to the very margin of the
loch, to see if anything is moving there. Should he find it so, he may
conclude that it is a flock of either duck, widgeon, or teal; those
first perceived resting on the shore, and the others feeding at the
water’s edge—of course not nearly so conspicuous. If there is no
motion at the margin of the loch he must keep his glass fixed, and
narrowly watch for some time, when, if what arrested his attention be
wildfowl asleep, they will, in all probability, betray themselves by
raising a head or flapping a wing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account