The sublime passage, which describes Man’s creation, besides the moral
influence and incitement of its main bearing—that Man is “the end of all
yet done”—that he is made in the likeness of God—that here only the
Father is distinctly and especially announced as consulting and
co-operating with the Son—besides the call that is thus made upon Man to
revere and guard the Spirit implanted in him—and besides the formal
precept with which it concludes, inculcating compliance with the sole
prohibition, is, in the following respect, also remarkable, when we look
for testimonies to the frame of mind in which the Poem was written. To
wit: The passage appears to embosom, in a very few words—in half-a-dozen
verses—an entire system of Ethics in the germ, or general thought.
Milton appears to lay as its basis the faculty which Man possesses of
_Self-Knowledge_, which he seems nearly to identify with Reason. Hence,
very loftily, but very summarily, he deduces the general moral condition
of Man, and his highest, that is to say, his religious obligations. We
must understand, no doubt, that the other inferior obligations are to be
similarly deduced. But the bare fact, that Milton _so places_ (and so
compendiously) this high and comprehensive speculation in a striking
manner, attests the temper of thinking in which the whole Poem has been
composed. In such a fact we unequivocally read that which has been
repeatedly here affirmed upon all kinds of evidence,—that the _Paradise
Lost_ was to Milton the depository (within room at once confined and
ample) for his lifelong studies; and in particular, that, holding the
office of a Poet at the highest—that is to say, seeing in every one upon
whom the high faculties of Poetry are bestowed, a solemn and missioned
Teacher to Men, Milton hoped, in this great Poem, to acquit himself of
this responsibility laid upon his own Spirit.
NORTH.
In the Kingdom of God’s Love, to obey him and to promote happiness is
one and the same thing. To disobey him and to destroy happiness is one
and the same thing. If it were possible for a finite being to see the
consequences of his actions as God sees them, he would perform precisely
the same actions, whether he aimed at augmenting to the utmost the
welfare of God’s Creation, or endeavoured to the utmost to conform his
actions to God’s Will.
SEWARD.
Unable to penetrate consequences, should he have access to know God’s
Will—he will by this means have a safe rule of effecting that which the
right, loving disposition of his Mind desires, but which his imperfect
foresight disables him from accomplishing by his own computation of
results.
TALBOYS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account