Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 75, No. 462, April 1854Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 75, No. 462, April 1854
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
Of course, this is tantamount to a rejection of Lord John Russell’s
proposal, that persons having £50 for a certain period of time deposited
in a savings’ bank, shall be entitled to the franchise. This is a
proposal which really will not bear examination. In the first place, it
would lead to a prodigious deal of fictitious registration and wholesale
manufacture of votes; in the second place, it is a most invidious and
senseless preference given to one species of property beyond another.
Why a savings’ bank? Are chartered, joint-stock, or private banks not as
good? And why give a vote for £50 in the shape of a deposit only? Money
is only equivalent to money’s worth. The man who expends £50 in the
furnishing of his house, or in purchasing a share in some small
business, or in fifty other ways of investment, is as good or better
than his neighbour, who lets his money lie in the savings’ bank. It is
utterly absurd to select one only kind of deposit for the franchise,
practically excluding hundreds of thousands, who have more money
invested in a different way. Then, again, what means are to be devised
for ascertaining the right of parties so registered to continue on the
roll? The tenure is obviously of the most precarious kind. An election
takes place to-day, and a depositor votes in virtue of his £50;
to-morrow he withdraws it from the bank. How is that to be ascertained?
We presume it is not contemplated that the savings’-bank books shall be
open to the inspection of the public; and if not, where are the means of
ascertaining the continued qualification of parties? In like manner, we
object to the qualification of £10 of yearly dividend from the Funds, or
from bank stock. It is reasonable enough, perhaps, on account of their
educational attainments, that graduates of universities should be
admitted to vote either in town or county, _provided that they are
assessed to the property and income tax, but not otherwise_; and the
receipt of £100 a-year of salary, as it implies direct rating, may be
taken as a sufficient qualification for borough or town voting.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account