Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 75, No. 462, April 1854Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 75, No. 462, April 1854
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
The French Government soon saw and
met the danger. Its ambassador was recalled and disavowed. Explanations
were promptly and frankly given, and readily received; and M. de
Nesselrode himself, however disappointed or checked, was forced to admit
that these explanations were perfectly satisfactory, and that the
redress obtained in favour of the Latins was not of a nature to trench
upon the immunities of the Greeks. That admission completely closed the
question of the Holy Places, in which France was exclusively interested.
But scarcely had it terminated when the mission of Prince Menschikoff
assumed all at once a strange and startling aspect. It was soon seen
that the holy places were but the mask which covered pretensions of far
greater moment. The French Government, struck by the haughty and
menacing tone of the Russian envoy, quickly understood the true cause of
the vast military preparations of Russia, and became aware that they
were the prelude to a state of things which would endanger the
independence of the Sultan and the security of his states. It considered
that France was bound by the Treaties of 1841, to which she was a party,
as well as by her position in Europe, not to regard with indifference
the proceedings of Russia; and, as a precautionary measure, it ordered
the Mediterranean fleet to proceed on the 20th March to the Greek
waters, and to remain there until further events rendered a nearer
approach to the Sultan’s capital necessary. When that order was issued,
France alone declared its belief in the grave and threatening character
of the pretensions of the Czar. Austria affected to give credit to the
repeated assurances of Russian moderation, and continued to keep aloof;
and Lord Aberdeen, whose attention had been drawn by the public press,
and, no doubt, by his own agents, to the coming storm, could perceive no
cloud, no angry speck in the political horizon. The French Government,
as is proved by the despatches in the _Moniteur_, persisted in its
conviction that the most serious dangers were at hand; and that Russia
believed that the long-expected moment had arrived for realising her
traditional policy in the East—the annihilation of the Ottoman Empire,
or its absorption, by the process of previous degradation. France
considered that, under such circumstances, complete obstruction was
impossible, and that, so far as England was concerned, the necessity of
maintaining her maritime superiority ought to be a sufficient motive for
her participation in a more active policy. The instructions to M. de
Lacour, dated the 22d March, presupposed the adherence of the British
Government to that policy; the co-operation of the English squadron was
anticipated for months previously; and, in his despatch of the 3d June,
M. Drouyn de Lhuys presumed that the policy of the French Cabinet would
soon become that of the Powers who were equally if not more interested
than France in the maintenance of the Treaties of 1841. This energetic
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account