Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 75, No. 463, May, 1854 — John Shaqi
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 75, No. 463, May, 1854Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 75, No. 463, May, 1854
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
It seems to have been ever taken for granted that these round towers
must have been fortresses, and the only remaining question seemed to
be—by what people, nation, or language were they so used? Was it by the
Phœnicians? A great antiquary showed that in Tyre and Sidon there must
have been edifices precisely of the same character, though no vestige of
them now remains. Did they belong to the Caledonians of the days of
Tacitus, or to the Atacotti, or to the Dalriads, or to the Albanich, or
to the Siol Torquil, or the Fion Gall, or the Dubh Gall? Or, were they
erected especially by some individual Aulaf or Maccus, or Sigurd, or
Thorfin, or Godred M‘Sitric, or Diarmid M‘Maelnambo—all gentlemen having
their own peculiar claims on the architectural merit? It occurred to us
one day to ask internally the question, whether they were fortresses or
strongholds at all? It arose as we looked down from the broken edge of
the galleried wall of one of those towers in solitary Glen-Elg Beg. It
stands, a hoar ruin on the edge of a precipice, where a torrent takes a
sudden turn; and nothing could be better conceived for the landscape
ideal of the remains of some robber stronghold of the middle ages, than
the remnant of circular masonry rising flush from the edge of the
precipice. But it was precisely the force with which these apparent
conditions of a fortified character were conveyed, that showed the utter
want of them in the others scattered throughout the valley. What could
they have defended? Whom could they have resisted?
Primitive fortresses are places where considerable armies or large
numbers of people go for protection from besieging enemies. Now, though
the outside circle of these burghs is considerable, yet, from the
thickness of the galleried wall, they only contain an inner area of from
twenty to thirty feet—the size of a moderate dining-room. And, while the
numbers they could have held were thus few, they possessed no means like
the medieval castles for assault, and could have been easily pulled to
pieces by an enemy. Nor, if they were places of strength, can it be
easily conceived why there should be a whole cluster of them in a place
like Glen Beg, and no others in the neighbouring districts.
The notion, indeed, of their being strongholds, seems to have been
grasped at once by their striking resemblance in structure and
dimensions to the Norman flanking round towers. But the Norman towers
were only outworks, to aid in defence of the central keep, and could
have been of small service as detached forts. There are many things
which have a warlike resemblance to this part of a feudal castle;—a
windmill, as Don Quixote’s chivalrous eye at once told him, possesses
the character very decidedly—so does a modern blast-furnace. The
columbarium lingering on the grounds of some old mansion is often
mistaken for a tower; and the prototype of the columbarium, the Roman
tomb, eminently anticipated the form of the Norman tower. Of one of
these Byron says,—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account