It may help us in some measure to the solution of the phenomenon to
remember that, however dim the light of the Church may have shone, it
was yet the representative of the intellectual system, and was in that
capacity carrying on a war with brute force. Catholicism was the great
rival and controller of the feudal strength and tyranny of the
age—_informe ingens cui lumen ademptum_. As intellect and knowledge were
the weapons with which they encountered the sightless colossus, it was
believed that the intellectual arsenals could not be too extensive or
complete—that intellect could not be too richly cultivated. Like many
combatants, they perhaps forgot future results in the desire of
immediate victory, and were for the moment blind to the effect so
nervously apprehended by their successors, that the light thus brought
in by them would illuminate the dark corners of their own ecclesiastical
system, and lead the way to its fall. Perhaps such hardy intellects as
Abelard or Aquinas may have anticipated such a result from the stimulus
given by them to intellectual inquiry, and may not have deeply lamented
the process.
But however it came about—whether in the blindness of all, or the
far-sightedness of some—the Church, from the thirteenth to pretty far on
in the fifteenth century, encouraged learning with a noble reliance and
a zealous energy which it would ill become the present age to despise or
forget. And even if it should all have proceeded from a blind confidence
that the Church placed on a rock was unassailable, and that mere human
wisdom, even trained to the utmost of its powers, was, after all, to be
nothing but her handmaiden, let us respect this unconscious simplicity
which enabled the educational institutions to be placed in so high and
trusted a position. The Church supplied something then, indeed, which we
search after in vain in the present day, and which we shall only achieve
by some great strides in academic organisation, capable of supplying
from within what was then supplied from without: and the quality thus
supplied was no less than that cosmopolitan nature, which made the
university not merely parochial, or merely national, but universal, as
its name denoted. The temporal prince might endow the academy with lands
and riches, and might confer upon its members honourable and lucrative
privileges, but it was to the head of the one indivisible Church that
the power belonged of franking it all over Christendom, and establishing
throughout the civilised world a free-masonry of intellect, which made
all the universities, as it were, one great corporation of the learned
men of the world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account