Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 76, No. 467, September 1854Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 76, No. 467, September 1854
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
It is in human nature: barbarism never
actually dies; it is an ill weed, hard entirely to eradicate, and is
ready to spring up in the most cultivated soils. The vulgar mind will
make its own Loretto: imagination and credulity want no angels but
themselves to convey anywhere a “_santa casa_;” nor will there be
wanting brocade and jewels, the crown and the _peplos_, for the
admiration of the ignorant. Are a few examples, if found and proved, and
of the best times—which is not clear—to establish the theory as good in
taste, or in any way part of the intention of the great sculptors? If
authorities adduced, and to be adduced, are worth anything, they must go
a great deal farther. Take, for instance, a passage from Pausanias, lib.
ii. c. 11: Καὶ Ὑγείας δ’ ἐσι κατα ταυτον αγαλμα οὺκ αν οὐδὲ τοῦτο ἴδοις
ῤᾳδίως, οὕτω, περιεχουσιν ἀυτὸ κόμαι τε γυναικὼν άὓ κειρονται τῇ θεῶ,
καὶ ἐσθῆτός Βαβυλωνίας τελαμῶνες.—“And after the same manner is a statue
of Hygeia, which you may not easily see, it is so completely covered
with hair of the women who have shorn themselves in honour of the
goddess, and also with the fringes of the Babylonish vest.” Here,
surely, is quite sufficient authority for Mr Jones to procure ample and
variously coloured wigs for the Venus de Medicis, and other statues, and
to order a committee of milliners to devise suitable vesture. Images of
this kind were mostly made of wood, easy to be carried about; and were
often, doubtless, made likest life, for the deception as of the real
presence of a deity. The view of art was lost when imposture commenced.
Mr Jones admits that the Greek sculptors did not intend exact imitation,
but his theory goes so close to it, it would be difficult to say where
it stops short. Indeed, he had better at once go the whole way, or we
may better say, “the whole hog,” with bristle brushes, for when he has
got rid of the “_prejudice_” in favour of white marble, his spectators
will be satisfied with nothing less than wax-work.
We remember hearing, in a remote village, the consolation one poor woman
gave another—“Look up to them pretty angels, with their lovely black
eyes, and take comfort from ’em.” These were angels’ heads in plaster,
round the cornice, which the church-wardens, year after year, with the
official taste and importance of the Roman Censors, had caused to be so
painted when, as they announced on a tablet, they “beautified” the
church. Of late years we have been removing the whitewash from our
cathedrals, thicker, by repetition, than Mr Owen Jones’s prescribed
coats of stucco. Should his theory prevail, we shall be again ashamed of
stone; white-lime will be restored until funds shall be found for
stucco, inside and out, as preparation for Mr Jones’s bright blue and
unmitigated vermilion and gold. It is frightful to imagine Mr Owen Jones
and his paint-pot over every inch of Westminster Abbey, inside and out.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account