mind without faith and without hope: but to conceive a whole universe
of moving and revolving worlds in such a category, indicates, in our
apprehension, a mind dead to feeling and shorn of reason.”[44]
“It is doubtless possible,” observes Sir David, however, a little
further on,[45] as if with a twinge of misgiving, “that the Mighty
Architect of the universe may have had other objects in view,
incomprehensible by us, than that of supporting animal and vegetable
life in these magnificent spheres.” Would that Sir David Brewster would
allow himself to be largely influenced by this rational and devout
sentiment! His book is, on the contrary, crammed with assertions from
beginning to end, and of a peremptory and intolerant character unknown
to the spirit of genuine philosophy.
The Essayist, however, is not incapable of quiet humour: and the
following pregnant passage is at least worthy to stand side by side with
that which we have just quoted from his indignant and eloquent
opponent:—
“Undoubtedly, all true astronomers, taught caution and temperance of
thought by the discipline of their magnificent science, abstain from
founding such assumptions upon their discoveries. They know how
necessary it is to be upon their guard against the tricks which fancy
plays with the senses; and if they see appearances of which they
cannot interpret the meaning, they are content that they should have
no meaning for them, till the due explanation comes. We have
innumerable examples of this wise and cautious temper in all periods
of astronomy. One has occurred lately. Several careful astronomers,
observing the stars by day, had been surprised to see globes of light
glide across the field of view of their telescopes, often in rapid
succession, and in great numbers. They did not, as may be supposed,
rush to the assumption that these globes were celestial bodies of a
new kind, before unseen, and that, from the peculiarity of their
appearance and movement, they were probably inhabited by beings of a
peculiar kind. They proceeded differently. They altered the focus of
their telescopes, looked with other glasses, made various changes and
trials; and finally discovered that these globes of light were the
winged seeds of certain plants, which were wafted through the air, and
which, illuminated by the sun, were made globular by being at
distances unsuited to the focus of the telescopes!”[46]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account