In alluding to the Nebulæ, as subjects of our most powerful telescopic
observation, the Essayist speaks in a tone of sarcasm concerning the
“_shining dots_,”—the “_lumps of light_” which are rendered apparent
amidst them: asking, what are these lumps? (1.) How large? (2.) At what
distances? (3.) Of what structure? (4.) Of what use?—adding, he must be
a bold man who undertakes to answer the question, that each is a Sun,
with attendant systems of planets. Sir David, exceedingly irate, says,
“We accept the challenge, and appeal to our readers:”—(1.) The size of
the dot, or lump, is large enough to be a Sun. (2.) He cannot answer
this, for want of knowing ‘the apparent distance between the centres of
the dots.’ (3.) Like our Sun—‘It will consist of a luminous envelope,
enclosing a dark nucleus.’ (4.) Of no conceivable use, but to give light
to planets, or to the solid _nuclei_ of which they consist. In his turn,
he asks the Essayist—what is the size, distance, structure, and use of
the dots, upon his hypothesis? The Essayist, he observes, is
silent;[120] but in his Essay, he had said, distinctly enough, “Let us
not wrangle about words. By all means let these dots be stars, if we
know about what we are speaking: if a star mean, merely, a luminous dot
in the sky. But that these stars shall resemble, in their nature, Stars
of the First Magnitude, and that such stars shall resemble Our Sun, are
surely very bold structures of assumption, to build on such a basis.
Some nebulæ are resolvable into distinct points: but what would it
amount to? That the substance of all nebulæ is not continuous; separate,
and separable into distinct luminous elements:—nebulæ are, it would then
seem, as it were of a curdled or granulated texture; they have run into
_lumps_ of light, or been formed originally of such lumps.” And then
follow some very ingenious and refined speculations, into which we have
not space to enter; and indeed we may be well content with what we have
done, having travelled from a tolerable depth in the crust of our own
little planet, past planet after planet, star after star, till we
reached the nebulous “outskirts of creation;” accompanied by two Mentors
of Infinitude,—whispering into our ear—one, that life, animal,
intellectual, moral, was swarming around us at every step; the other,
that that life ceased with our own Earth, as far as we were able to
detect its existence, and giving us very solemn and mysterious reasons
why it should be so.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account