Scornful in demeanour and imperious in language, Mentschikoff entered
Constantinople more like the bearer of a gage of defiance than a
messenger of peace. His deportment startled the Divan out of its
habitual calm; and the British Chargé d’Affaires, at the instance of the
Turkish Ministers, requested our Admiral at Malta to move his squadron
into the Levant. This demand was not complied with; but the French fleet
was ordered to Salamis. And this movement is condemned by Mr Kinglake as
most impolitic; for it happened, he says, at a time when “the anger of
the Emperor Nicholas had grown cool,” and it “gave deep umbrage to
Russia.” From which he means us to infer that Louis Napoleon, following
his deep design of fanning the flame of discord when it should seem to
languish, was so timing the advance of his fleet as to neutralise the
pacific influences which had begun to have their sway.
Now what are the circumstances of the case? The French Emperor knew
nothing of the conversation with Sir Hamilton Seymour, which did not
transpire till long afterwards. Neither he nor the British Government
were aware of the Czar’s real demands. Ostensibly the matter of
controversy was still the original question between him and the Czar
concerning the Holy Places. And while one of the disputants, France, had
urged her views in the ordinary way by the mouth of her ambassador, her
opponent was preparing to coerce the arbiter by a menacing mission
backed by an army and a fleet. The army already touched the frontier,
the fleet was prepared to sail for the Bosphorus. Will anybody except Mr
Kinglake blame the French Emperor for sending his fleet to Salamis? or
say that he was bound, before taking such a step, to consider whether it
might not give deep umbrage to Russia?
Mentschikoff then proceeded to urge his demands. These were, that, in
addition to the concessions required respecting the Holy Places, the
Sultan should, by treaty with the Czar, engage to confirm the Christian
subjects of the Porte in certain privileges and immunities. Though the
Sultan was very willing to confirm them in these privileges, he was by
no means willing to bind himself by treaty with the Czar to do so; for
by so doing he would give the Czar a right, as a party to the treaty, to
see that it was fulfilled; and hence those who were to benefit by the
privileges would naturally regard most, not him who granted them, but
him who could compel their observance. In fact, it was virtually
conferring on the Czar the protectorate of the Sultan’s Christian
subjects.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account