A second objection is the extent of the injury which is necessarily
inflicted on the donor. His radial artery must be exposed through
an incision of considerable length, and must be ligatured at the
conclusion of the process. The operation becomes, therefore, a matter
of some moment to the donor, who will be permanently scarred, and can
under no circumstances be used for transfusion more than twice.
A third objection is that the transfusion cannot be done with due
regard to the condition of the patient. A delicate and difficult
operation has to be performed with the donor and recipient lying side
by side, their arms close together. It is therefore almost imperative
that both should be on operating-tables of a convenient height.
Often, however, with an exsanguinated patient it is very important
that he should not be moved from his bed, but as a bedside operation
direct transfusion becomes difficult indeed!
A final objection is that in some people the radial artery is of very
small calibre, so that when all preparations have been made, and
the artery exposed, it is found to be quite impossible to proceed.
Another element of uncertainty is thus introduced.
There is, therefore, little to be said in favour of direct
transfusion, and much to be urged against it. This method has,
indeed, in my own opinion, come to be of historical interest only.
For this reason the different methods have only been very briefly
described. For more detailed information, reference must be made
to the various original communications, which will be found in the
Bibliography.
=Indirect Transfusion.=--The methods of indirect transfusion may
be divided into those which depend upon the use of an anticoagulant
mixed with the blood and those in which the blood is given
unaltered. The technique of either process is simple compared
with that of direct transfusion, though any method which makes
use of whole blood can never be quite as free from uncertainty or
difficulty as one which introduces the use of an anticoagulant. If
the blood is prevented from clotting, the chief cause of failure
in performing blood transfusions is removed. With any whole-blood
method of transfusion speed is exceedingly important, frequent
practice is a very great advantage, and it is essential, as with
direct transfusion, that the donor and recipient should be in close
proximity to one another, if not actually side by side.
On the other hand, the use of an anticoagulant renders speed and
frequent practice of less account. The blood can be drawn, and can
then be put on one side until the best moment for giving it has
arrived. Due regard may be had to the patient’s condition, since the
blood can be carried about and can be given at leisure to the patient
in his bed without disturbing him and almost without his knowing it.
The donor, too, is not exposed to the mental shock of lying for some
time side by side with a patient who may be _in extremis_, or may
even expire during the operation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account