Blue Shirt and Khaki: A ComparisonArchibald, James F. J. (James Francis Jewell)
History
Blue Shirt and Khaki: A Comparison
Archibald, James F. J. (James Francis Jewell)
Great Britain. Army; Military art and science; South African War, 1899-1902; United States. Army
Perhaps no better illustration can be given of the new military
conditions which modern strategy and tactics have to meet than a
picture that shows how an actual battlefield looks. During the third
day the fighting had been very severe, and in one place in the line
the British had been compelled to charge a position several times in
order to prevent being completely surrounded. There were eight Maxim
one-pounder machine guns, several Colts’ machine guns, and a large
number of heavy guns in action during the entire day, and at one
time they were all concentrated at one point. I took a photograph,
which shows better than anything else how modern warfare has lost all
picturesque features. This picture shows nothing but a placid landscape
that might have been taken on any farm, instead of which thousands of
men were fighting desperately. At the time the photograph was taken
there was a charge going on, but the khaki clothing makes the men
invisible to the camera. Bullets were singing across the plain like
sheets of rain, and shells were screeching overhead; along the ridge
there was a constant crackling of small arms; but the landscape itself
was as quiet as that of a New England farm.
CHAPTER VI.
Feeding the Two Armies
[Illustration: U. S. Officer providing for feeding the poor.]
The most important work of an army is that of the commissary
department, which is the one division of labor that receives the least
credit and no glory. An army might get along without its engineer
corps, or its signal service; it could at least march without guns; but
it cannot move a foot without its full supply of food.
A few days before Santiago fell, General Shafter wired the War
Department that he thought it likely he would be compelled to withdraw.
The despatch was made public in the press; to withdraw meant a retreat,
and instantly a wave of indignation arose against General Shafter. He
was blamed for being weak; he was blamed for allowing himself to be
drawn into a trap; he was blamed for everything that the criticising
public could think of in their resentment. That the American army
should retreat was maddening to the people, for they could see no
reason for such action, except the power of the enemy against them. It
was not the enemy, however, that threatened to drive the Fifth Army
Corps back, nor was it the weakness of the commanding general--it was
a rain storm. The columns had pushed forward toward Santiago as fast
as possible, and so long as the line of communication between the
front and the base of supplies at Siboney was open all went well. But
suddenly it rained, and then all was different. The road was eight
miles of swimming mud, flanked by impossible jungle; a wheel could not
turn in it, and the pack animals could flounder through it but slowly.
Hence the supply of rations at the front began to dwindle away, and
General Shafter decided that he must move his army toward the food
supply, as the food supply could not move toward the army.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account