Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear, and rage : $b an account of recent researches into the function of emotional excitement — John Shaqi
Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear, and rage : $b an account of recent researches into the function of emotional excitementCannon, Walter B. (Walter Bradford)
Science
Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear, and rage : $b an account of recent researches into the function of emotional excitement
Cannon, Walter B. (Walter Bradford)
Emotions; Mental health; Mind and body
All these considerations, taken with the proof that sympathetic
impulses increase secretion of the adrenal glands, and taken also
with the evidence that, during such emotional excitement as was
employed in these experiments, signs of sympathetic discharges
appeared throughout the animal from the dilated pupil of the eye to
the standing hairs of the tail-tip, led us to the conclusions that
the characteristic action of adrenin on intestinal muscle was in
fact, in our experiments, due to secretion of the adrenal glands,
and that that secretion is increased in great emotion.
The Evidence that Adrenal Secretion is Increased by
“Painful” Stimulation
As mentioned in the first chapter, stimulation of sensory fibres in
one of the larger nerve trunks is known to result in such nervous
discharges along sympathetic paths as to produce marked inhibition
of digestive processes. Other manifestations of sympathetic
innervations--e. g., contraction of arterioles, dilation of pupils,
erection of hairs--are also demonstrable. And since the adrenal
glands are stimulated to activity by sympathetic impulses, it
was possible that they would be affected as are other structures
supplied with sympathetic fibres, and that they would secrete in
greater abundance when sensory nerves were irritated.
The testing of this possibility was undertaken by Hoskins and
myself in 1911. Since bodily changes from “painful” stimulation can
in large degree be produced in an anesthetized animal, without,
however, an experience of pain by the animal, it was possible to
make the test quite simply. The sensory stimulus was a rapidly
interrupted induced current applied to the sciatic nerve. The current
was increased in strength as time passed, and thus the intensity
of the effect, indicated by continuous dilation of the pupils, was
maintained. There was no doubt that such stimulation would have
caused very severe pain if the animal had not been anesthetized.
Indeed, the stimulus used was probably much stronger than would
be necessary to obtain a positive result in the absence of the
anesthetic (urethane), which markedly lessens the irritability of
visceral nerve fibres.[44] In different instances the stimulation
lasted from three to six minutes. Throughout the period there was
markedly increased rapidity and depth of breathing.
As Fig. 9 shows, the normal blood, removed from the vena cava before
stimulation, caused no inhibition of the beating segment, whereas
that removed afterwards produced a deep relaxation. Hoskins and I
showed that the increased respiration which accompanies “painful”
stimulation does not augment adrenal activity. We concluded,
therefore, that when a sensory trunk is strongly excited the adrenal
glands are reflexly stimulated, and that they pour into the blood
stream an increased amount of adrenin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account