Bones and I : $b or, the skeleton at home — John Shaqi
Bones and I : $b or, the skeleton at homeWhyte-Melville, G. J. (George John)
Philosophy
Bones and I : $b or, the skeleton at home
Whyte-Melville, G. J. (George John)
English fiction -- 19th century; Paranormal fiction, English
Letter after letter they have flared, and blackened, and shrivelled up.
There is an end of them—they are gone. Not a line of those different
handwritings shall I ever see again. The bold, familiar scrawl of the
tried friend and more than brother; why does he come back to me so
vividly to-night? The stout heart, the strong arm, the brave, kind
face, the frank and manly voice. We shall never tread the stubble nor
the heather side by side again; never more pull her up against the
stream, nor float idly down in the hot summer noons to catch the light
air off the water on our heated faces; to discourse, like David and
Jonathan, of all and everything nearest our hearts. Old friend! old
friend! wherever you are, if you have consciousness you must surely
sometimes think of _me_; I have not forgotten _you_. I cannot believe
you have forgotten me even _there_.
And the pains-taking, up-and-down-hill characters of the little
child—the little child for whom the angels came so soon, yet found
it ready to depart, whose fever-wasted lips formed none but words of
confidence and affection, whose blue eyes turned their last dim, dying
looks so fondly on the face it loved.
And there were letters harder to part with than these. Never mind, they
are burnt and done with; letters of which even the superscription once
made a kind heart leap with pleasure so intense it was almost pain;
letters crossed and re-crossed in delicate, orderly lines, bearing
the well-known cipher, breathing the well-known perfume, telling the
old, false tale in the old, false phrases, so trite and worn-out, yet
seeming always so fresh and new.
The hand that formed them has other tasks to occupy it now; the
heart from which they came is mute and cold. Hope withers, love
dies—times are altered. What would you have? It is a world of change.
Nevertheless this has been a disheartening job; it has put me in low
spirits; I must call “Bones” out of his cupboard to come and sit with
me.
“What is this charm,” I ask him, “that seems to belong so exclusively
to the past?—this ‘tender grace of a day that is dead’? and must
I look after it down the gulf into which it has dropped with such
irrepressible longing only because it will never come back to me?
Is a man the greater or wiser that he lived a hundred years ago or
a thousand? Are reputations, like wine, the mellower and the more
precious for mere age, even though they have been hid away in a cellar
all the time? Is a thing actually fairer and better because I have
almost forgotten how it looked when present, and shall never set eyes
on it again? I entertain the greatest aversion to Horace’s _laudator
temporis acti_, shall always set my face against the superstition that
‘there were giants in those days’; and yet wherever I went in the world
previous to my retirement here that I might live with you, I found the
strange maxim predominate, that everything was very much better before
it had been improved!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account