Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. IPutnam, George Haven
History
Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. I
Putnam, George Haven
Books -- History -- 400-1450; Copyright; Freedom of the press -- History -- To 1500; Manuscripts; Printers
The typical feature of the revival of learning in Italy was, of course,
the rediscovery of the literature of Greece. In the poetic simile of
Symonds, “Florence borrowed her light from Athens, as the moon shines
with rays reflected from the sun. The revival was the silver age of
that old golden age of Greece.”[415] The comparison of Florence with
Athens has repeatedly been made. The golden ages of the two cities were
separated by nearly two thousand years; but history and human nature
repeat themselves, and historians have found in the Tuscan capital of
the fifteenth century a population which, with its keen intellectual
nature, subtle and delicate wit, and restless political spirit, recalls
closely the Athens of Pericles. The leadership which belonged to Italy
in literature, art, scholarship, and philosophy, was, within Italy,
conceded to Florence.
The first name in the list of Florentine scholars whose influence
was important in this revival is that of Petrarch. He never himself
mastered the Greek language, but he arrived at a realisation of the
importance of Greek thought for the world, and he preached to others
the value of the studies which were beyond his own grasp. It was at
Petrarch’s instance that Boccaccio undertook the translation into Latin
of the _Iliad_. Among Latin authors, Petrarch’s devotion was given
particularly to Cicero and Virgil. The fact that during the first
century of printing more editions of Cicero were produced than of any
other classic author must have been largely due to the emphasis given
by the followers of Petrarch to the beauty of Cicero’s latinity and the
permanent value of his writings.
Petrarch was a devoted collector of manuscripts, and spared neither
labour nor expense to secure for his library codices of texts
recommended as authoritative. Notwithstanding his lack of knowledge
of Greek, he purchased for his collection all the Greek manuscripts
which came within his reach and within his means. Fortunately for
these expensive literary tastes, he appears to have possessed what we
should call a satisfactory independence. Some of his manuscripts went
to Boccaccio, while the rest were, at his death, given to the city of
Florence and found place later in the Medicean Library.
Petrarch laid great stress on the importance, for the higher education
of the people, of efficient public libraries, and his influence with
wealthy nobles served largely to increase the resources of several of
the existing libraries. In his scholarly appreciation of the value
of such collections, he was helping to educate the community to
support the booksellers, while in the collecting of manuscripts he was
unwittingly doing valuable service for the coming printer. He died in
1374, ninety years before the first printing-press began its work in
Italy. A century later his beautiful script served as a model for the
italic or cursive type which was first made by Aldus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account