Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. IPutnam, George Haven
History
Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. I
Putnam, George Haven
Books -- History -- 400-1450; Copyright; Freedom of the press -- History -- To 1500; Manuscripts; Printers
Louis IX. took the ground that it was better to transcribe books than
to purchase the originals, because in this way the mass of books
available for the community was increased. Louis was, however, speaking
only of religious literature; he could not believe that the world would
be benefited by any distribution of the works of profane writers.
Ziegelbauer is in accord with Montalembert and others in giving to
the Benedictines of Iceland the credit for the collections made of
the Eddas and for the preservation of the principal traditions of the
Scandinavian mythology. He also confirms the conclusion arrived at
by the Catholic historians generally, that the literary monuments of
Greece and Rome which escaped the devastation of the barbarians were
saved by the monks and by them alone. He cites, as a few examples from
the long list of classics that were thus preserved, five books of the
_Annals_ of Tacitus, found at Corbie; the treatise of Lactantius on
the _Death of Persecutors_, preserved at Moissac; the _Auluraria_ of
Plautus, and the _Commentaries_ of Servius on Virgil, preserved in
Fleury; the _Republic_ of Cicero, found in the library of Fleury in the
tenth century, etc.[83]
In confirmation of the statement that the classics were by no
means neglected by the earlier monastery collectors, Montalembert
cites Alcuin, who enumerated among the books in his library at York
the works of Aristotle, Cicero, Pliny, Virgil, Statius, Lucan, and
Trogus Pompeïus. A further reference to this library will be found
in the chapter on the Monastery Schools. In Alcuin’s correspondence
with Charlemagne, he quotes Ovid, Horace, Terence, and Cicero, and
acknowledges that in his youth he had been more moved by the tears
of Dido than by the Psalms of David.[84] Loup de Ferrières speaks
of having borrowed from his friends the treatise _De Oratore_ of
Cicero, a _Commentary on Terence_, the works of Quintilian, Sallust,
and Suetonius. He says further that he was occupying himself in
correcting the text of the oration of Cicero against Verres, and that
of Macrobius.[85] Abbot Didier of Monte Cassino, who later became
Pope, succeeding Gregory VII., had transcripts made by his monks of
the works of Horace and Seneca, of several treatises of Cicero, and
of the _Fasti_ of Ovid.[86] S. Anselm, Abbot of Bec in the time of
Gregory VII., recommends to his pupils the careful study of Virgil and
of other profane writers, “omitting the licentious passages.” _Exceptis
his in quibus aliqua turpitudo sonat._[87] It is not clear what method
the abbot proposed to have pursued in regard to the selection of the
passages to be eliminated. It is hardly probable that at this time
there had been prepared, either for the use of the monks or of any
other readers, anything in the form of expurgated editions. S. Peter
Damian seems to have expressed the true mind of an important group
at least of the churchmen of his time, when he referred to the study
of pagan writers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account