Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. IIPutnam, George Haven
History
Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. II
Putnam, George Haven
Books -- History -- 400-1450; Copyright; Freedom of the press -- History -- To 1500; Manuscripts; Printers
The scholars of the Humanistic school had made it their chief interest
to further the production and the understanding of the works of the
classic writers, and when the influence of the Reformation brought
about a reaction against the influence of the literature of Greece and
Rome, these Humanist scholars found their special occupation gone.
Many of them sought occupation on the staffs of the publishers and
earned a livelihood in editorial service of a different character,
or sometimes in purely hack work in collating and proof-reading.
When the Basel edition of _S. Jerome_ was in preparation, Amerbach
applied to Reuchlin for aid in connection with the printing of the
Hebrew portions, and wrote, “We shall be very ready to pay for your
help whatever you may ask.” Reuchlin had shortly before completed
the publication of his _Rudimenta_. The work had been undertaken at
the author’s cost, and as the sales were but small, he found himself
in trouble with his printer, Anshelm. He wrote to his good friend
Amerbach, “I shall be well pleased to do the editorial work required
for the _Jerome_ without compensation if you will relieve me from the
claims of this troublesome Anshelm.”[81] It is evident that Reuchlin,
while imagining that he was publishing his _Rudimenta_ at his own risk,
had in fact left the payment of the printer’s bill to be contingent
upon the sales of the book, having no other resources available, and
the printer had, therefore, been made involuntarily a sharer of the
risk, while if the work had succeeded, he would have been entitled to
no share in the profits. Anshelm’s account must, however, have been
settled by Amerbach, in consideration of the work done by Reuchlin on
the _Jerome_, as we find him, later, again in friendly relations with
the Hebrew scholar.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account