Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. IIPutnam, George Haven
History
Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. II
Putnam, George Haven
Books -- History -- 400-1450; Copyright; Freedom of the press -- History -- To 1500; Manuscripts; Printers
The edition of the New Testament, edited by Erasmus at the instance
of Froben, was based in part upon the previous labours of Laurentius
Valla, to whom must be given the honour of having been the first to
attempt a revision of the text by a comparison of authorities. In
fact, some time before beginning work on his New Testament, Erasmus
had edited for Froben a volume containing the annotations of Valla.
In April, 1515, Beatus Rhenanus writes to Erasmus from Basel: “Froben
wants you to place in his hands your proposed edition of the New
Testament, and promises that he will give for your work as much as
anybody.”[108] A sentence so worded, written by one literary man
to another, has quite a modern sound, giving the impression that
several publishers were prepared at this time to bid against each
other for the editorial service of the first scholar of Europe. As a
fact, however, such a work as was projected could at this time have
been undertaken in but three or four places, while only two or three
publishers possessed the knowledge, the enterprise, or the plant
requisite for its production. The New Testament with the Erasmian notes
might have been printed in Paris, as far as the facilities for Greek
type were concerned, but the influence of the Theological Faculty of
the Sorbonne was entirely unfavourable to the presentation to the
public of any critical or analytical work on the Scriptures, and it
was very difficult, if not impracticable, for a university publisher
to handle successfully a work in the department of theology, of
which the Sorbonne disapproved. Koberger of Nuremberg had publishing
facilities adequate for such an undertaking, but Koberger appears to
have associated himself with the more conservative group of Catholic
scholars, and to this group the Testament of Erasmus, with its critical
notes, seemed to be a very dangerous innovation.
The result showed that there was ground for their misgivings, as the
Testament of Erasmus was to prove of most vital service to the cause of
the Reformation, although the learned editor himself was at the time
regarded with suspicion, if not with enmity, by the larger number of
Protestant leaders. There remained the Press of Aldus; the Venetian
would unquestionably have been very ready to take charge of the book,
and his Press possessed at the time larger facilities for the printing
of Greek than could be offered by Froben, or than existed outside of
Venice. Erasmus appears, however, to have decided that for the purposes
of this work Basel was a better centre of distribution than Venice,
and it was doubtless the case that a much larger circle of readers
could be looked for in Switzerland, Germany, and other regions to be
conveniently reached from Basel, than was to be found in the market
more immediately at the command of Venice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account