Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. IIPutnam, George Haven
History
Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. II
Putnam, George Haven
Books -- History -- 400-1450; Copyright; Freedom of the press -- History -- To 1500; Manuscripts; Printers
Morrhius, writing in 1531 to Erasmus, says: “There are even within
the precincts of this college [the Sorbonne] those who wish well to
you, but they are obliged to whisper, fearing to declare in public
their real sentiments, to such a pitch has tyranny attained here.
Your friends rejoice exceedingly that you have replied with so much
moderation to the _Determinationes_ of our divines, for they were
afraid you would have branded the whole Faculty with a stigma that
would have marked them to posterity, which you would have certainly
been justified in doing.” It is apparent from this and from many
similar references that Erasmus was obliged to carry on contentions, so
to speak, with both hands. On the one side, he was bitterly assailed
by Lutherans no less than by Calvinists for failing to support with
his talents, his learning, and his world-wide influence the cause
of the Protestants. On the other side, the divines of the Roman
Church stigmatised as a dangerous heretic a man who insisted that the
writings of the Fathers, and even the Roman versions of the Scriptures
themselves, must be subjected to critical analysis and to textual
corrections, and that not a few of the _dicta_, which had been made
the basis of doctrines called authoritative, were either fraudulent
interpolations in the original texts, or were the result of the glosses
and blunders of incompetent copyists.
Vascosanus, who was a son-in-law of Badius, continued the work of
printing classic texts, and won repute for the beauty and correctness
of his editions. He interested himself particularly in the production
of the works of Cicero, printed in quarto with commentaries. The
writings of Cicero were, as we shall note, very largely favoured by
the publishers of the first century of printing. The only important
contemporary author with whose work the imprint of Vascosanus is
associated, was Budæus, for whom he published an edition of the
treatise _De Asse et ejus Partibus_. The device adopted by Vascosanus
was a fountain, delineated, according to Maittaire’s description, with
artistic ornaments, and surrounded by the motto, ἐν βιβλίοισ ῥέει ἡ
Σοφίας πηγὴ.[4] From 1566 to 1576, Vascosanus was _Typographus Regius_.
The great typographer, Frederic Morel, was one of his grandsons.
Without undertaking to give in detail the list of the
printer-publishers who are recorded by Maittaire and Greswell as having
rendered honourable service during this period in the production in
Paris of scholarly Latin and Greek texts, I will proceed at once to
the record of Robert Estienne, whose work was of first importance
for France and for Europe, and who is to be ranked with the great
printer-publishers of the world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account