Boscobel: Or, The History of his Sacred Majesties most Miraculous Preservation After the Battle of Worcester, 3. Sept. 1651Blount, Thomas
History
Boscobel: Or, The History of his Sacred Majesties most Miraculous Preservation After the Battle of Worcester, 3. Sept. 1651
Blount, Thomas
Boscobel (England) -- Early works to 1800; Charles II, King of England, 1630-1685 -- Early works to 1800
Produced by StevenGibbs and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
[Illustration: Cha.y. 2. was proclaymed King of great Britan, France &
Ireland at Worcester, 23 Aug. 1651.]
BOSCOBEL:
OR, THE HISTORY OF _HIS SACRED MAJESTIES_
MOST MIRACULOUS PRESERVATION
After the Battle of Worcester, 3. Sept. 1651.
JOEL i. 2.
_Hear this ye Old Men, and give ear all ye Inhabitants of the
Land: Has this been in your dayes, or in the dayes of your
fathers?_
LONDON:
Printed for _Henry Seile_, Stationer
to the Kings most excellent Majesty, 1660.
DONCASTER:
REPRINTED AND SOLD BY THOMAS AND HUNSLEY,
Sold also by Stoddart & Craggs, Hull;
Mozley, Gainsbro'; Slater, Bacon, & Co. Sheffield;
and may be had of all other
Booksellers.
1809.
TO _THOMAS PARK_, AND _SAMUEL EGERTON BRYDGES_, _ESQRS._ WHOSE
UNITED EFFORTS, IN RESCUING FROM OBLIVION THE EARLY PRODUCTIONS OF
THIS COUNTRY, WILL CAUSE THEM TO BE REVERED BY EVERY BIBLIOGRAPHER,
THIS LITTLE WORK IS PRESENTED AS A TESTIMONY OF THE UNFEIGNED
REGARD _THE EDITOR OF THESE SHEETS_ BEARS TO THEIR LABOURS.
ADVERTISEMENT FROM _THE EDITOR_.
The book which is here republished contains an account of the sufferings
of CHARLES the Second, after the battle of Worcester, until his escape
to the continent;--written by a co-temporary, and dedicated to that
monarch whose misfortunes he records; we may therefore naturally
infer, that the book is a true relation of the same.[1]
[1] This is not the only account that is published, for we
find it related by Bates, in his Elenchues, and by the Earl
of Clarendon, whose account he received from the king
himself.
As this work has become so scarce that a copy can with difficulty be
procured, the editor thought he should do a service to the curious by
having it reprinted _verbatim_[2] from the edition of 1660.
[2] The original style, &c. being preserved, will account for
the very erroneous _punctuation_, to which it was deemed
necessary to adhere.
The subject of this tract is interesting: it teaches us the instability
of human greatness. We are presented with a picture of the sufferings
of one, by lineal descent born to be the governor of a kingdom, reduced
to the alternative of either suffering on a scaffold, or quitting the
kingdom in habits of disguise.
When princes forget their subjects, or they their king, then both lose
their former allegiance and respect, they become mutual enemies, and
their inveteracy does not diminish until one or both are on the
precipice of destruction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account