Authors, Scottish -- 18th century -- Biography; Biographers -- Great Britain -- Biography; Boswell, James, 1740-1795
Mr. Davies, who sat next to Dr. Percy, having after this had
some conversation aside with him, made a discovery which, in
his zeal to pay court to Dr. Johnson, he eagerly proclaimed
aloud from the foot of the table: 'O, Sir, I have found out
a very good reason why Dr. Percy never heard Mounsey swear or
talk bawdy; for he tells me, he never saw him but at the Duke
of Northumberland's table.' 'And so, Sir (said Johnson loudly,
to Dr. Percy), you would shield this man from the charge of
swearing and talking bawdy, because he did not do so at the
Duke of Northumberland's table....' Dr. Percy seemed to be
displeased, and soon afterwards left the company.
Later, in the course of conversation, Johnson denied any merit to
Swift for writing 'The Conduct of the Allies'; then
_recollecting that Mr. Davies, by acting as an informer, had
been the occasion of his talking somewhat too harshly to
his friend Dr. Percy, for which, probably, when the first
ebullition was over, he felt some compunction_,[6] he took an
opportunity to give him a hit; so added, with a preparatory
laugh, 'Why, Sir, Tom Davies might have written "The Conduct
of the Allies."' Poor Tom being thus suddenly dragged into
ludicrous notice in presence of the Scottish doctors, to whom
he was ambitious of appearing to advantage, was grievously
mortified.
The compunction, however, on this occasion seems to have had a short
duration, for Boswell goes on to say:
When I called upon Dr. Johnson next morning, I found him
highly satisfied with his colloquial prowess the preceding
evening: 'Well (said he), we had good talk.' _Boswell_: 'Yes,
Sir, you tossed and gored several persons.'
Boswell seems to have had the power of picking out all that was
characteristic and important, of ruthlessly discarding unnecessary
details and presenting only the salient points, of seeing a scene as a
whole, with its more vivid colours flashing out as it were from a dull
background, so that the whole impression is complete and clear. The
smallest conversations, as we saw, were dealt with in this way. And
as he 'Johnsonised' the talk which he had himself taken down,
and 'Johnsonised' the stories given to him by Mr. Langton, he
'Johnsonised' in the same way these larger scenes. While retaining
most of the words used by Johnson himself, Boswell seems to have added
here and there a characteristic expression to make the whole more
pointed, and to have compressed it all till it preserved nothing but
the true Johnsonian flavour.
* * * * *
In all this, the artistic part of his work, Boswell was expressing
his own conception of Johnson. But it has been doubted by some whether
this is a true view of him, or whether the whole is not overdrawn.
Dr. Birkbeck Hill says that Johnson was drawn by Boswell as 'too
awful.'[7]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account