Brave British soldiers and the Victoria Cross: a general account of the regiments and men of the British Army, and stories of the brave deeds which won the prize "for valour"
History
Brave British soldiers and the Victoria Cross: a general account of the regiments and men of the British Army, and stories of the brave deeds which won the prize "for valour"
Great Britain -- History, Military -- 19th century; Great Britain. Army -- Biography; Soldiers -- Great Britain -- Biography; Victoria Cross
of “Whipping Willie Gordon,” the sobriquet he obtained in the regiment
through his fondness for the lash. He left the service with the rank of
general, and spent his latter days at Fyvie Castle, where he professed
himself a misogynist, and ended by marrying his cook.
An insurrection, attended with still more disastrous results, occurred
in the Grant or Strathspey Fencibles in 1795. This regiment was raised
by Sir James Grant of Grant in 1793, and about two months after the
declaration of war by France, and, with the exception of three Englishmen
and two Irishmen, was composed entirely of natives of the North. After
being embodied at Forres, and inspected by General Leslie, the Grant
Fencibles were stationed in most of the towns in the South of Scotland
till 1795, when we find them at Dumfries. As a general rule, the best
understanding has always subsisted between the Highlanders and their
officers, and there is no sacrifice they are not prepared to make for
those who have secured their confidence; but their proud, unbending
spirit rebels at once against treachery or injustice. Enough has been
already written to justify this assertion, and what we are about to
relate tends only to confirm it. In 1794, when the regiment was stationed
at Linlithgow, an attempt was made by the officers to persuade the men to
extend their service, which, in terms of their enlistment, was confined
to Scotland. It is probable that this attempt on the part of the officers
originated merely from a desire to secure their own position in the army
for a longer period, and it would probably have succeeded if they had won
the confidence of the men by a frank avowal of their motives. As it was,
they disclosed only enough to excite their suspicions, and the report
spread that they had been sold to government. Nothing further was done in
the matter at the time, but the officers were eyed with distrust, and a
bad spirit sprang up in the regiment. An incident occurred at Dumfries
the following year which brought matters to a crisis, and caused an
open mutiny. The greatest freedom of intercourse was permitted between
officers and men when both belonged to the same clan. This familiarity
did not interfere with the strictness of discipline any more than it
does in the French army, in which it has survived till the present
day. An amusing illustration of this familiarity occurred in the 93rd
Highlanders when they were stationed in Canada. There belonged to the
regiment a young lieutenant—who, in virtue of his being the inheritor of
an illustrious Scottish name and twenty thousand a year, deemed it the
correct thing to remain ignorant of even the simplest military duty—and
a private named Jock Muir, an excellent soldier, but an inveterate
drunkard. There was a mutual understanding between the lieutenant and
Jock that they should stand by one another in every emergency, or, in
other words, that Jock should stand by the lieutenant when on duty,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account