Alternative histories (Fiction); Science fiction; Time travel -- Fiction; United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Fiction
“You have the makings of a metaphysician, Hodgins,” he said
witheringly, for metaphysics was one of the most despised words in his
vocabulary. “The reasoning is infantile. Answering you and the Reverend
Shaw on your own level, I could say that time is a convention and that
all events occur simultaneously. Or if I grant its dimension I can ask,
What makes you think time is a simple straight line running flatly
through eternity? Why do you assume that time isnt curved? Can you
conceive of its end? Can you really imagine its beginning? Of course
not; then why arent both the same? The serpent with its tail in its
mouth?”
“You mean we not only play a prepared script but repeat the identical
lines over and over and over for infinity? There’s no heaven in your
cosmos, only an unimaginable, never-ending hell.”
He shrugged his shoulders. “That you should spout emotional apologetics
at me is part of what you call the script, Hodgins. You didnt select
the words nor speak them voluntarily. They were called into existence
by what I said, which in turn was mere response to what went before.”
Weakly I was forced back to a more elementary attack. “You don’t act in
accordance with your own conviction.”
He snorted. “A thoughtless remark, excusable only because automatic.
How could I act differently? Like you, I am a prisoner of stimuli.”
“How pointless to risk ruin and imprisonment as a member of the Grand
Army when no one can change what’s predestined.”
“Pointless or not, emotions and reflections are responses just as much
as actions. I can no more help engaging myself in the underground than
I can help breathing, or my heart beating, or dying when the time
comes. Nothing, they say, is certain but death and taxes; actually
everything is certain. Everything,” he repeated firmly.
I went back to sorting some pamphlets which were to be sold for
wastepaper, shaking my head. His theory was unassailable; every
attack was discounted by the very nature of the thesis. That it was
false I didnt doubt; its impregnability made its falseness still more
terrifying.
There were fully as many imaginary discussions with Tyss as real ones.
Yet even in these disembodied arguments I could gain no advantage. Why
do you look back on the War of Southron Independence with regret for
what might have been, if no might-have-been is possible? I asked him
mentally, knowing his answer, I cannot help myself, was no answer at
all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account