Britain's Deadly Peril: Are We Told the Truth? — John Shaqi
Britain's Deadly Peril: Are We Told the Truth?Le Queux, William
History
Britain's Deadly Peril: Are We Told the Truth?
Le Queux, William
Secret service -- Germany; Spies; World War, 1914-1918
In the prosecution of a war of such magnitude as the present unhappy
conflict the public feeling of a truly democratic country such as ours
is of supreme importance. It is, in fact, the most valuable asset of
the military authorities, and it is a condition precedent for success
that the nation shall be frankly told the truth, so far as it can be
told without damage to our military interests.
Mr. Bonar Law, in the House of Commons, put the case in a nutshell when
he said that--
"He had felt, from the beginning of the war, that as much information
was not being given as might be given without damage to national
interests. Nothing could be worse for the country than to do what the
Japanese did--conceal disasters until the end of the war. He did not
say that there had been any concealment, but the one thing necessary
was to let the people of this and other countries feel that our
official news was true, and could be relied upon. He wondered whether
the House realised what a tremendous event the battle of Ypres, in
November, was. The British losses there, he thought, were bigger than
any battle in which purely English troops were engaged. It was a
terrible fight, against overwhelming odds, out of which British troops
came with tremendous honour. All the account they had had was Sir
John French's despatch. Surely the country could have more than that.
Whoever was in charge, when weighing the possible damage which might
be brought about by the giving of news, should also bear in mind the
great necessity for keeping people in this country as well informed as
possible."
That, I venture to think, is a perfectly fair and legitimate criticism.
The battle of Ypres was fought in November. Mr. Law was speaking in
February. Who can say what the country would have gained in recruiting,
in strength of determination, in everything that goes to make up the
_morale_ so necessary for the vigorous conduct of a great campaign, had
it been given, at once, an adequate description of the "terrible fight
against overwhelming odds" out of which the British Thomas Atkins came
with so much honour?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account