British Airships, Past, Present, and FutureWhale, George
History
British Airships, Past, Present, and Future
Whale, George
Aircraft; Airships -- Britain -- History
The semi-rigid, which has been exploited principally by the Italians
with their Forlanini airships, and in France by Lebaudy, has an
envelope, in some cases divided into separate compartments, to which is
attached close underneath a long girder or keel. This supports the car
and other weights and prevents the whole ship from buckling in the
event of losing gas. The semi-rigid type has been practically
undeveloped in this country.
The non-rigid, of which we may now claim to be the leading builders, is
of many varieties, and has been developed in several countries. In
Germany the chief production has been that of Major von Parseval, and
of which one ship was purchased by the Navy shortly before the outbreak
of war. In the earliest examples of this type the car was slung a long
way from the envelope and was supported by wires from all parts. This
necessitated a lofty shed for its accommodation as the ship was of
great overall height; but this difficulty was overcome by the
employment of the elliptical and trajectory bands, and is described in
the chapter dealing with No. 4.
A second system is that of the Astra-Torres. This envelope is trilobe
in section, with internal rigging, which enables the car to be slung
very close up to the envelope. The inventor of these envelopes was a
Spaniard, Senor Torres Quevedo, who manufactured them in conjunction
with the Astra Company in Paris. This type of envelope has been
employed in this country in the Coastal, C Star, and North Sea
airships, and has been found on the whole to give good results. It is
questionable if an envelope of streamline shape would not be easier to
handle, both in the air and on the landing ground, and at present there
are partisans of both types.
Thirdly, there is the streamline envelope with tangential suspensions,
which has been adopted for all classes of the S.S. airship, and which
has proved for its purpose in every way highly satisfactory.
Of these three types the rigid has the inherent disadvantage of not
being able to be dismantled, if it should become compelled to make a
forced landing away from its base. Even if it were so fortunate as to
escape damage in the actual landing, there is the practical certainty
that it would be completely wrecked immediately any increase occurred
in the force of the wind. On the other hand, for military purposes, it
possesses the advantage of having several gas compartments, and is in
consequence less susceptible to damage from shell fire and other causes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account