other, have no ambiens; but from their general resemblance in other
particulars to birds which have an ambiens, it was thought by Professor
Garrod that the loss in them was a recent event, and that they might
be fairly placed in one great group of birds with an ambiens which he
termed, somewhat lengthily, the ‘homalogonatæ,’ or normal-kneed birds,
reserving the name ‘anomalogonatæ,’ or abnormal-kneed birds, for the
passerines, &c., without an ambiens.
_CLASSIFICATION_.
One great advantage of the study of birds is that the amount of facts
to be learnt in anatomy is far less than with some other groups. They
are wonderfully uniform in structure. There is less difference in
structure between an ostrich and a humming-bird than between, say, a
lizard and a crocodile. Though this may be gratifying to the student
of birds who is content with a broad knowledge of anatomical fact,
it has its disadvantages--very distinct disadvantages--to those who
want to arrange and classify the species. As there are computed to be
over eleven thousand different kinds of birds, it is clear that an
arrangement of some kind is wanted; we must have an artificial brain
in which to store the characters of each bird in their proper place.
But before we can consider this it is necessary to consider first what
place birds as a whole occupy in Nature. It used to be thought that
warm-blooded birds ought to be put near to the warm-blooded mammals.
But it is now the general opinion that, as we have before pointed out
in relation to certain details of structure, their proper place is
in the neighbourhood of the reptiles. In fact they are regarded as a
separate division of an order of vertebrated animals which has received
the name of Sauropsida, which signifies ‘lizard-like’ animals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account