British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
On the 5th of March it was resolved to send the Fourteenth,
Thirty-seventh, and Fifty-third Foot, completed by drafts from the new
independent companies, to join the Duke as a brigade under Major-general
Ralph Abercromby. These regiments, however, were subject to the same
instructions as the Guards, namely, to remain within immediate reach of
their transports in case their services should be required elsewhere.
Their quality was such that the Adjutant-general felt constrained to
apologise for them both to Abercromby and to the Duke of York. “I am
afraid,” he wrote to the Duke, “that you will not reap the advantage
that you might have expected from the brigade of the Line just sent over
to you, as so considerable a part of it is composed of nothing but
undisciplined and raw recruits; and how they are to be disposed of until
they can be taught their business I am at a loss to imagine.... I was
not consulted upon the subject until it was too late to remedy the evil,
but I hope that my remonstrances will be of some use in the modelling of
troops for the Continent in future.” ◆April 1.◆ It need hardly be added
that, on their arrival in Holland, two out of the three battalions were
found utterly unfit for service, the new recruits being old men and
weakly boys, worse than the worst that had been accepted even at the
period of greatest exhaustion during the American War. To send them on
active service was, therefore, simply waste of money.[106]
But this was only one of the evils which ensued because an extremely
ignorant civilian was too vain to consult his military advisers before
giving military orders. Any soldier at the War Office could have
told him that the method of raising independent companies to recruit
existing regiments had been found wasteful and unsatisfactory in the
past; and, indeed, at this very time the Chief Secretary Cooke wrote
to him from Ireland a strong protest against the whole system. It
was expensive, because it meant the provision of half-pay for their
officers as soon as the men had been drafted out; it was unfair to old
subalterns, because they were passed over by boys who by good fortune
had raised recruits cheaply. It produced a bad class of recruit,
because these young officers were poor judges of men; and finally it
encouraged desertion, for the crimps, so long as they poured a certain
number of recruits into the depots by a certain time, cared not the
least whether they deserted afterwards. Nor was Cooke content only to
criticise, for he produced an alternative plan for allowing each of the
fourteen battalions in Ireland to raise two additional companies of one
hundred men apiece, and for granting to the commanding officers the
privilege of recommending officers for them. The scheme was approved
and was found to be most successful; but it was not introduced into
England, where, on the contrary, the number of independent companies
was still further increased.[107]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account